2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-functional attribute and antioxidative capacity of edible insect protein preparations and hydrolysates thereof: Effect of multiple mode sonochemical action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No studies on human subjects were available. Table 1 (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) shows the studies investigating the in vitro antioxidant activity of edible insects and invertebrate fractions. Several methods were taken into account: the most used was the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), performed in 14 papers (7-15, 18-20, 23, 24), while 2,2 ′ -azino-bis(3ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and ferric reducing Abbreviations: 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2 ′ -deoxyguanosine; ABTS, 2,2 ′ -azino-bis(3ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); CAT, catalase; DPPH, 1,1-diphenyl-2picrylhydrazyl; CP, compound; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; GHG, greenhouse gas emissions; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GST, glutathione Stransferase; LS, lipo-soluble extract; MDA, malondialdehyde; NO, nitric oxide; Nrf2, Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor; ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity; PH, protein hydrolysates; RNS, reactive nitrogen species; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SAHR, scavenging activity on hydroxyl radicals; SOD, superoxide dismutase; SRSC, superoxide radical scavenging capacity; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; TEAC, Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity; TOS, total oxidant status; WI, whole insect; WS, water-soluble extract.…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No studies on human subjects were available. Table 1 (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) shows the studies investigating the in vitro antioxidant activity of edible insects and invertebrate fractions. Several methods were taken into account: the most used was the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), performed in 14 papers (7-15, 18-20, 23, 24), while 2,2 ′ -azino-bis(3ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and ferric reducing Abbreviations: 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2 ′ -deoxyguanosine; ABTS, 2,2 ′ -azino-bis(3ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); CAT, catalase; DPPH, 1,1-diphenyl-2picrylhydrazyl; CP, compound; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; GHG, greenhouse gas emissions; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GST, glutathione Stransferase; LS, lipo-soluble extract; MDA, malondialdehyde; NO, nitric oxide; Nrf2, Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor; ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity; PH, protein hydrolysates; RNS, reactive nitrogen species; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SAHR, scavenging activity on hydroxyl radicals; SOD, superoxide dismutase; SRSC, superoxide radical scavenging capacity; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; TEAC, Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity; TOS, total oxidant status; WI, whole insect; WS, water-soluble extract.…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…antioxidant power (FRAP) were utilized in 11 (6,7,10,11,13,14,16,17,19,20,22) and 8 studies (6, 10-12, 14, 15, 19, 21), respectively. Antioxidant activity was investigated also as scavenging activity against different radicals, metal ion chelating activity, reducing power, or, only for the paper of Sun et al (25), with β-carotene and linolenic acid bleaching tests.…”
Section: In Vitro Antioxidant Activities Of Edible Insectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…** The peptide identification probability was ranging from 96 to 100%. 1 Control, 2 Pretreated, and 3 Simultaneous conditions.…”
Section: Effect Of High Hydrostatic Pressure Coupled To Enzymatic Digmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, edible insects were targeted as a potential alternative protein resource to address the problem of a global food crisis. In Western countries, mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) is of particular interest, being evidenced in recent years by several publications related to protein quality and the improvement of techno-functional properties [1][2][3]. However, recent studies described an allergenic risk that was related to the consumption of edible insects due to potential cross-reactivity with other arthropods, especially crustaceans [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, proteins from grasshoppers ( Schistocerca gregaria ) and honey bees ( Apis mellifera ) were also demonstrated to have foaming/emulsifying properties that were comparable to the properties of proteins from mealworm larvae and silkworm pupae, which suggests that they could also be used as an additive [15]. More recently, Mintah et al [16] demonstrated that ultrasonic processing contributes significant changes in various functional attributes of edible insect proteins and hydrolysates. In terms of the physiological activities of insect proteins from edible species, several insects have been shown to inhibit the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) [17], while peptides from silkworm pupae ( B. mori ) displayed α-glucosidase inhibitory activity [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%