2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economical evaluation of coupling ionizing radiation and biological treatment process for the remediation of real pharmaceutical wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatment cost for 1 m 3 effluent was 6.38 USD m –3 . In previous studies, 64 69 various combinations of ozone-based AOPs were found to be cost effective comparative to other treatment techniques.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment cost for 1 m 3 effluent was 6.38 USD m –3 . In previous studies, 64 69 various combinations of ozone-based AOPs were found to be cost effective comparative to other treatment techniques.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmaceutical trade industries generate a massive variety of constituents by utilizing inorganic and organic combinations as raw sources thus increase in enormous size of poisonous and multifaceted organic liquescent wastes contained greater intensities of mixed solids. Large and reduced power wastewater creeks initiated from industrial unit frequently comprises various kinds of contaminants, counting organic combinations [13]. Furthermore, numerous kinds of wastewater feature from the pharmaceutical industries vary critically, many categories of pharmaceutical wastewater are resilient to biodegradation, have greater nitrogen in ammonia amounts, color depth and toxicity; and are hard to handle [56].…”
Section: -1500 1260mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, different groupings of traditional wastewater treatment procedures have been applied, for instance chemical and physical approaches (advanced oxidation routes, chemical treatments, adsorption, filtration, and coagulation) besides joined biological courses for the handling of pharmaceutical wastewater. Ultimately, all these systems have different COD elimination capacities, contingent to the kind and organic capacity of the wastewater [13].…”
Section: Hybrid Systems (Hss)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a separate study, combined process of coagulation, electron beam treatment, and biological treatment was performed. An overall reduction in COD of 94% and 89% was achieved LSW and HSW, respectively [55]. The radiation doses were varied from 25-100 KGy at different pH that represent acidic, neutral and alkaline media.…”
Section: Advances In Pharmaceutical and Petrochemical Wastewater Treamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As presented in the previous sections, the technical performance of the application of ionizing radiation technology in wastewater treatment is effective in disinfection and reduces the bio-refractory nature of several persistence organic pollutants. Several studies proved the economical feasibility of the e-beam and γ irradiation technologies [21,32,41,48,51,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. For e-beam technology, the capital costs include the accelerator price, building shield, conveyer, cooling and ventilation systems, and monitoring system [57].…”
Section: Sustainability Of the Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%