2022
DOI: 10.1080/19397038.2022.2101707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economic feasibility of a remote PV mini-grid electrification system for five localities in Chad

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing these results with those of (Benelkadi et al 2018) in Algeria, (Salisu et al 2019) in Nigeria, (Aboagye et al 2020) in Ghana, (Sanwogou et al 2019) in Togo, (Imam et al 2019) in Saudi Arabia, (Dagtekin et al 2014) in Turkey, (Vakili et al 2022) in Italie, (Poudyal et al 2021) in Nepal, we deduce that the price per kWh of electricity obtained for scenario 6 is higher. However, the price displayed in the work of (Hanen et al 2018) in Tunisia, (Singh and Rizwan 2023) in India, (Hassanea et al 2022) in Tchad is respectively much higher (0.81 USD/kWh, 0.61USD/kWh, 0.33 USD/kWh) than ours as well as the return on investment period obtained by (Aboagye et al 2020) in Ghana (15 years), (Sanwogou et al 2019) in Togo (8.6 years), (Dagtekin et al 2014) in Turkey (7.8 years), (Imam et al 2019) in Saudi Arabia (14.6 years), (Vakili et al 2022) in Italie (6.2 years), (Poudyal et al 2021) in Nepal (8.6 years). The studies of Amoussou in Benin and more precisely in the city of Kandi confirms the results of this study on the price of kWh which varies from 0.09 USD to 0.23 USD for a system without storage and with energy storage according to the 'author.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By comparing these results with those of (Benelkadi et al 2018) in Algeria, (Salisu et al 2019) in Nigeria, (Aboagye et al 2020) in Ghana, (Sanwogou et al 2019) in Togo, (Imam et al 2019) in Saudi Arabia, (Dagtekin et al 2014) in Turkey, (Vakili et al 2022) in Italie, (Poudyal et al 2021) in Nepal, we deduce that the price per kWh of electricity obtained for scenario 6 is higher. However, the price displayed in the work of (Hanen et al 2018) in Tunisia, (Singh and Rizwan 2023) in India, (Hassanea et al 2022) in Tchad is respectively much higher (0.81 USD/kWh, 0.61USD/kWh, 0.33 USD/kWh) than ours as well as the return on investment period obtained by (Aboagye et al 2020) in Ghana (15 years), (Sanwogou et al 2019) in Togo (8.6 years), (Dagtekin et al 2014) in Turkey (7.8 years), (Imam et al 2019) in Saudi Arabia (14.6 years), (Vakili et al 2022) in Italie (6.2 years), (Poudyal et al 2021) in Nepal (8.6 years). The studies of Amoussou in Benin and more precisely in the city of Kandi confirms the results of this study on the price of kWh which varies from 0.09 USD to 0.23 USD for a system without storage and with energy storage according to the 'author.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed system includes a two-stage multi-chain inverter with ZETA DC-DC converter and a modified P&O algorithm. A techno-economic analysis of a solar photovoltaic mini-grid system for five typical rural communities in Chad while promoting renewable energy system adaptation and rural electrification was presented by (Hassanea et al 2022). The system development costs, electricity tariff, and power generation sizing are then performed by the authors via the discounted cost of electricity (LCOE) technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WPS for water supply and irrigation for rural and remote areas by autonomous PV systems demonstrates a significant role [25][26][27][28] . WPS usually consists of a water source and PV array, water reservoir, and electrical pump motor as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Irrigation Water Pumping Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%