2011
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno‐economic evaluation of an inclusion body solubilization and recombinant protein refolding process

Abstract: Expression of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli is normally accompanied by the formation of inclusion bodies (IBs). To obtain the protein product in an active (native) soluble form, the IBs must be first solubilized, and thereafter, the soluble, often denatured and reduced protein must be refolded. Several technically feasible alternatives to conduct IBs solubilization and on-column refolding have been proposed in recent years. However, rarely these on-column refolding alternatives have been evaluated f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These inclusion bodies need to be solubilized using chaotropic/reducing agents to disrupt noncovalent interactions and break the interchain disulfide bonds. Subsequently, in the refolding step, the concentration of the solubilizing agents is decreased, resulting in protein refolding . This can be achieved by buffer exchange via batch dilution or liquid chromatography.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Implementation Of Pat Towards Downstream mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inclusion bodies need to be solubilized using chaotropic/reducing agents to disrupt noncovalent interactions and break the interchain disulfide bonds. Subsequently, in the refolding step, the concentration of the solubilizing agents is decreased, resulting in protein refolding . This can be achieved by buffer exchange via batch dilution or liquid chromatography.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Implementation Of Pat Towards Downstream mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Refolding is often achieved by diluting the denaturant through addition (or exchange) of buffer, or by using liquid chromatography (chromatographic refolding) like size‐exclusion chromatography . High pressure treatment, either in the absence or presence of chaotropic agent, can also be useful to foster refolding of proteins from inclusion bodies .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Using a chaotropic agent, like urea or guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl), a reducing agent to break disulfide bonds, and alkaline pH, commonly solubilizes inclusion bodies (see e.g. ). Refolding is often achieved by diluting the denaturant through addition (or exchange) of buffer, or by using liquid chromatography (chromatographic refolding) like size‐exclusion chromatography .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons SEC has been widely used at lab scale for protein refolding in either batch or continuous mode using single or multiple column configurations (i.e. simulated moving bed) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Existing work has also developed mathematical models for separation in SEC using various model proteins in their native forms [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional method of protein refolding, namely batch dilution refolding, requires working at low protein concentrations in order to prevent aggregation, which in turn results in low productivity impeding high-throughput protein refolding and downstream processing for production of many bacterially expressed recombinant proteins [1]. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC)-based protein refolding addresses this issue to some extent by facilitating gradual spatial isolation of protein molecules and unfolding agents, which can prevent aggregation and allow for application of higher protein loading concentrations and simultaneous purification compared with batch dilution refolding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%