2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economic evaluation and life cycle assessment of a biorefinery using winery waste streams for the production of succinic acid and value-added co-products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the laboratory fed-batch scenario, the MPSP, GWP100, and FEC of our biorefinery were the lowest reported values thus far for a biorefinery producing SA. Furthermore, for the pilot batch scenario, the biorefinery's MPSP of $1.37/kg [$1.23-1.54/kg; 5th-95th percentiles, hereafter in brackets] was consistently below the reported market price range of $2.53-2.89/kg 30 (adjusted to 2016$) and near the low end of bio-based SA MPSP values ranging from $1.08-3.63/kg reported in the literature 42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50 (Fig. 4A).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For the laboratory fed-batch scenario, the MPSP, GWP100, and FEC of our biorefinery were the lowest reported values thus far for a biorefinery producing SA. Furthermore, for the pilot batch scenario, the biorefinery's MPSP of $1.37/kg [$1.23-1.54/kg; 5th-95th percentiles, hereafter in brackets] was consistently below the reported market price range of $2.53-2.89/kg 30 (adjusted to 2016$) and near the low end of bio-based SA MPSP values ranging from $1.08-3.63/kg reported in the literature 42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50 (Fig. 4A).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It depends on many factors, including the availability of low-cost biomass feedstock, economic competitiveness with petrochemical routes, and environmental benefits/impacts associated with these processes. In this direction, extensive studies have been reported on techno-economic and life cycle analysis for fermentative production of SA from various biomasses and wastes (Table 9) [186][187][188][189][190][191]. SA production costs or selling prices vary depending on the type of feedstock and plant capacity.…”
Section: Sustainability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high organic content of these wastes not only implies ecological concerns if discharged without further treatment but also provides a reservoir of carbon sources for chemicals and energy production. In comparison to the first-generation bioethanol industry, their integration into a second-generation biorefinery model would reduce the environmental impact of the wine industry through cost-effective waste valorization (Ioannidou et al, 2022;Moonsamy et al, 2022). Furthermore, multi-product biorefineries are being promoted (Baptista et al, 2021) rather than traditional biorefineries that focus on the production of a single product (Baptista et al, 2021;del Río et al, 2021).…”
Section: Integrated Biorefinery From Wine Wastementioning
confidence: 99%