2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3366062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-Economic Comparison of Combined Cycle Power Plants with Pre-Combustion Co2 Capture Via Two Different Reforming Methods: Chemical Looping Reforming and Gas Switching Reforming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A brief schematic of the four chemical looping processes is given in Figure 30: In the reforming process (GSR), a natural gas fuel is converted to a syngas stream, as opposed to a complete fuel conversion occurring in combustion. The syngas produced can be later employed as feedstock for flexible H2 production in a WGS unit or electricity in a combined cycle [55]. In the water splitting process, an additional steam stage is used to obtain H2, while attaining full conversion of the fuel in the reduction reactor using an iron oxide oxygen carrier.…”
Section: Reactor In Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A brief schematic of the four chemical looping processes is given in Figure 30: In the reforming process (GSR), a natural gas fuel is converted to a syngas stream, as opposed to a complete fuel conversion occurring in combustion. The syngas produced can be later employed as feedstock for flexible H2 production in a WGS unit or electricity in a combined cycle [55]. In the water splitting process, an additional steam stage is used to obtain H2, while attaining full conversion of the fuel in the reduction reactor using an iron oxide oxygen carrier.…”
Section: Reactor In Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%