2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Personnel cost includes annual operating labor, maintenance labor and administrative and support labor. A total of four employees were assumed for plant operation management (1 person/shift), with a yearly cost of 30,000 €/year per person [45].…”
Section: Items Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personnel cost includes annual operating labor, maintenance labor and administrative and support labor. A total of four employees were assumed for plant operation management (1 person/shift), with a yearly cost of 30,000 €/year per person [45].…”
Section: Items Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another group of papers (60 papers, 11%) reviewed the cost of the total CCS chain and its individual processes and compared different power plants with and without CCS, according to typical energy-economic indicators, such as the levelised cost of electricity or CO 2 avoidance costs. Key papers on this topic include a review paper on progress and new developments in CCS from Plasynski et al [78] (d = 291), and cost comparisons between power plants from Tola and Pettinau [79] (d = 258) and Pettinau et al [80] (d = 232).…”
Section: Cluster C3 (Blue 541 Nodes 127%)-techno-economic Assessmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing the emissions from fossil‐fuel power plants is critical for both protecting the environment and achieving sustainable economic development . One way to reduce the emissions is to improve the energy conversion efficiency of power plants—decreasing the per unit emission of CO 2 . A solution with a greater potential to reduce CO 2 emissions is to capture and utilize or sequester the CO 2 emitted from fossil‐fuel power plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] One way to reduce the emissions is to improve the energy conversion efficiency of power plants-decreasing the per unit emission of CO 2 . 7 A solution with a greater potential to reduce CO 2 emissions is to capture and utilize or sequester the CO 2 emitted from fossil-fuel power plants. Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is an emerging technology with extensive research and development efforts globally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%