2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economic assessment of turning gasification-based waste char into energy: A case study in South-Tyrol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a payback analysis has been done by solving the following equation, where A are the savings minus the operation and maintenance costs, P is the present worth capital costs, and IR is the interest rate. The variable n represents the number of years to return the investment in comparison with the reference case [67].…”
Section: Techno-economic Assessment With Net Present Value Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a payback analysis has been done by solving the following equation, where A are the savings minus the operation and maintenance costs, P is the present worth capital costs, and IR is the interest rate. The variable n represents the number of years to return the investment in comparison with the reference case [67].…”
Section: Techno-economic Assessment With Net Present Value Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solid by-product, char, has long been considered a waste without any further value. To this day, Italian plant owners dispose of it at a cost; in South Tyrol, the 46 operative gasifiers produce about 1300 Mg per year of char, and plant owners must pay a total of 200,000 € for its disposal [48]. On the one hand, gasification char is similar to pyrolysis biochar: they are rich in carbon and porous.…”
Section: On the Use Of Subproducts In A Circular Economy Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most interesting applications are arguably those within the gasification process itself, as they eliminate costs for transport of the char and for the purchase of specific materials. Recently, many researchers devoted their efforts to this topic: Ravenni et al [52], Buentello-Montoya et al [53] and Cordioli et al [54] proved that char is suitable for reforming and cracking the gasification tar; Marchelli et al [43] and Benedetti et al [55] showed that it is able to adsorb H 2 S and CO 2 ; Hernández et al [56] and Piazzi et al [48] assessed the benefits of recirculating it to the gasifier or burning it in a separate unit, respectively.…”
Section: On the Use Of Subproducts In A Circular Economy Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the application of biochar along with other secondary carbon biocarriers, i.e., biomass residues, torrefied biomass, etc., in metallurgical activities, has been reviewed by Kieush et al, (2022) [6] focusing on torrefied biomass. Torrefaction or mild pyrolysis refers to the thermal treatment of biomass under an inert atmosphere process at lower temperatures (200-300 • C) than the conventional form of pyrolysis (350-1100 • C) that enhances biomass characteristics without changing the high molecular content and preserving a higher yield of solid material usable as a carbon substitute [7]. Biochar, as a result of pyrolysis or gasification at 350-110 • C, is a byproduct of processes aimed mainly at energy production and the residual char is therefore regarded as a byproduct or waste material [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the DRI/EAF route, it is feasible to utilize biocoke as a carbon source up to 100% of the time, even while adding a significant quantity of torrefied biomass (up to 50%) into the coal blend. [7]. In the EAF process, carbon, in the form of coke or anthracite, can be used for charge, injection, or as a recarburizer [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%