2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economic assessment of a plant based on a three reactor chemical looping reforming system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure depicts the net electrical efficiency, the carbon capture efficiency, and the energy efficiency penalty for the NGCC plant without CO 2 capture, the CLC combined cycle plant, the CLC plant with NG‐fired COMB, and the CLC plant with H 2 ‐fired COMB. There are various H 2 production processes with different production and carbon capture efficiencies . Therefore, the source of H 2 from the conventional production process such as steam methane reforming with post‐combustion CO 2 capture to the most ideal H 2 production processes is considered in the current study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure depicts the net electrical efficiency, the carbon capture efficiency, and the energy efficiency penalty for the NGCC plant without CO 2 capture, the CLC combined cycle plant, the CLC plant with NG‐fired COMB, and the CLC plant with H 2 ‐fired COMB. There are various H 2 production processes with different production and carbon capture efficiencies . Therefore, the source of H 2 from the conventional production process such as steam methane reforming with post‐combustion CO 2 capture to the most ideal H 2 production processes is considered in the current study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various H 2 production processes with different production and carbon capture efficiencies. [38,[40][41][42] Therefore, the source of H 2 from the conventional production process such as steam methane reforming with post-combustion CO 2 capture to the most ideal H 2 production processes is considered in the current study. For ease of comparison, four subcases are considered with different H 2 production and carbon capture efficiencies.…”
Section: Plant Performance With An Additional Combmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in recent years, research has focused more on atmospheric pressure systems because of the operational challenges of solids circulation at high pressure, as CO 2 separation has a minimal energy penalty even at atmospheric pressure. In addition to using the chemical looping scheme for combustion, the scheme has been proposed as a method to produce syngas [5], hydrogen [6], maleic anhydride [7], methanol [8], and sulfuric acid [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this process, an oxygen carrier (OC) is used to transfer oxygen from air to the fuel. This process is economical and the cost of H 2 produced is in parity with other H 2 production technologies [3]. It employs three reactors: fuel reactor, steam reactor and air reactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is similar to that used by Khan and Shamim [3] in their techno-economic assessment. All the sub-models and assumptions used are similar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%