2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economic analysis of conventional and advanced high-pressure tube trailer configurations for compressed hydrogen gas transportation and refueling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 compare the results at low and high hydrogen demand for two distances of 161 km and 483 km. The results in red correspond to the literature results [Reddi et al, 2018] and show the CGT that gives the minimum cost. The results in black, correspond to the study results and show the CGT that is used the most to deliver the hydrogen demand.…”
Section: V31 Results Comparison To the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 4 compare the results at low and high hydrogen demand for two distances of 161 km and 483 km. The results in red correspond to the literature results [Reddi et al, 2018] and show the CGT that gives the minimum cost. The results in black, correspond to the study results and show the CGT that is used the most to deliver the hydrogen demand.…”
Section: V31 Results Comparison To the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For the optimal CGT, [Reddi et al, 2018] evaluated the impact of three CGT configurations (of 600, 690 and 790 kg capacity) on the transportation and refuelling cost. The simulation was performed in order to deliver hydrogen over different transportation distances of 100, 200 and 300 miles and to hydrogen refuelling stations of various capacities of 250, 500 and 750 kg/ day corresponding to low hydrogen demand (around 200 kg/ day), medium hydrogen demand (around 400 kg/ day) and high hydrogen demand ( around 1000 kg/ day).…”
Section: V31 Results Comparison To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCOH reported in Section 3.1 considers the equipment and utilities to supply hydrogen to a pipeline, but not H2 storage. Reddi et al [7] investigated the cost of different tube trailer configurations. These costs were escalated from 2018 to 2023 using CEPCI [6] for this study.…”
Section: Hydrogen Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same will be discussed in the forthcoming paragraphs. The other researchers (Reddi et al, 2018;Shayegan et al, 2006) have also been deliberated for computing the average costs. The cost analysis concerning truck trailer transmission is limited in nature as it has the low carrying capacity and shot distance as depicted in Table 9, although it has a nominal cost of $0.59/kg with short distance but, if the trailer capacity opts for maximum production with long-distance, the cost will increase dramatically to $9.85/kg.…”
Section: Cost Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%