2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-Economic Analysis of Amine-based CO2 Capture Technology: Hunter Plant Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solutions of 3 and 4 in water can be attained with concentrations up to 3.5–3.8 mol/L, which corresponds to the same range of concentrations used in industrial plants applying aqueous MDEA/piperazine technology [2a] . The TGA analysis of the commercial mixture MDEA/piperazine (Figure S7a) exhibits a gradual loss of mass from around 50 °C (due to the evaporation of the mixture components), until a temperature of approximately 200 °C (complete mass loss).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions of 3 and 4 in water can be attained with concentrations up to 3.5–3.8 mol/L, which corresponds to the same range of concentrations used in industrial plants applying aqueous MDEA/piperazine technology [2a] . The TGA analysis of the commercial mixture MDEA/piperazine (Figure S7a) exhibits a gradual loss of mass from around 50 °C (due to the evaporation of the mixture components), until a temperature of approximately 200 °C (complete mass loss).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full oxidation of hydrocarbons in the FT off-gas stream is assumed. A CCS cost of 79 €/tonne is assumed, along with a capture rate of 90% (Kheshgi et al, 2012;Panja et al, 2022). (Towler and Sinnott, 2017;Turton and Shaeiwitz, 2017).…”
Section: Ghg Emissions Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the effectiveness of that approach at capturing low contents of CO 2 in feedstock [ 6 ], there are a number of drawbacks [ 7 ], including the corrosion of pipelines and equipment, high investment costs, the loss of sorbent solution due to its degradation, as well as potential environmental threats. The most critical one is that the process has a high energy consumption requirement that is equal up to the 30% of power plant’s produced energy, resulting in a CO 2 capture cost of 40–100 $/ton and rise in electricity price of 50–90% [ 8 , 9 ]. This forced the world’s chemical engineering society to design new energy efficient processes that agree with the modern green chemistry principles [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%