Techno-economic analysis of a circular microalgal approach for enhanced wastewater treatment and resource recovery in Northern Portugal

Nobre, Maria L.F.; Tavares, Daniel; Fraga, Carolina; Oliveira, Bruna; Dias, Mafalda; Mesquita, Sara; Oliveira, Catarina M.; Pires, José C.M.

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140389

Cited by 10 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The NPV value after 20 years showed an impressive return of AU$1097854 with an IRR value of 21.11% due to the high biomass productivity and revenue from bio-oil and biofertilizer production. The results of the present study align with the findings of Nobre et al in that the microalgae grown in a municipal wastewater source in PBR revealed a NPV value of −1.30 M€ with an IRR of 7%. It is also important to note that the present study did not consider the revenue from treating the wastewater with a price point for environmental impact of not removing the contaminants.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Emergy Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating the Sustainability of Solar-Integrated Ecotechnologies in Winery Wastewater Treatment

Praveen,

Abinandan,

Venkateswarlu

et al. 2024

ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovative approaches in sustainable wastewater management are vital in addressing climate change. This study introduces a novel assessment of solar-integrated ecotechnologies, focusing on the constructed wetland (CW) and microalgae-based systems, viz., high-rate algal pond (HRAP) and photobioreactor (PBR), for the treatment of winery wastewater. Utilizing Emergy analysis and life cycle assessment (LCA), we comprehensively compared these technologies in terms of environmental impact, resource recovery efficiency, and circular economy integration. Our Emergy analysis of the HRAP revealed a substantial reliance on renewable inputs (94%) and its lower nonrenewable resource consumption compared to the CW system. The Emergy sustainability index initially indicated a preference for the CW system (42.93 sej year −1 ; sej = solar emjoule), but deeper analysis showed greater sustainability in the HRAP (341 sej year −1 ) and PBR (118 sej year −1 ). LCA results further revealed that PBR systems had a significant land-use footprint, impacting other environmental indices such as photochemical ozone formation and freshwater eutrophication. Additionally, the HRAP and PBR demonstrated a marked reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (−24800 and −23700 kg of CO 2 -eq, respectively) compared to the CW system (320 kg of CO 2 -eq). Life cycle cost analysis underscored the economic viability of these systems, with Scenario 3 (PBR) emerging as the most economically sustainable, exhibiting the highest internal rate of return (IRR) at 21.11% and a positive net present value after 20 years. Conversely, Scenario 1 (CW system), with its significant initial investment of AU$741220, showed no IRR due to the absence of revenue generation. Importantly, our study introduces circularity index scores as a novel element, revealing that the HRAP and PBR effectively incorporate circularity measures across various impact categories. These measures had moderate impacts, as indicated by scores close to but not exceeding 0.10, whereas the CW system showed no significant improvement, highlighting the need for more robust circularity strategies. Overall, our integrated framework provides a holistic view of the environmental impact and economic aspects, emphasizing the potential of solarintegrated microalgal systems in promoting circular (bio)economy practices and sustainable environmental management in the viticulture sector.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%