2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4901358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques to evaluate the quality of medical images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In medical images, Kocsis et al [25] proposed a set of quantitative measurements related to medical image quality parameters, Perez-Diaz in his work [26] presents a study using some known quality metrics to evaluate the quality in medical images, and Chow and Paramesran [27] publish a review and a classification of medical image quality assessment. An improved SSIM quality for compressed medical images was developed by Kumar et al [28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In medical images, Kocsis et al [25] proposed a set of quantitative measurements related to medical image quality parameters, Perez-Diaz in his work [26] presents a study using some known quality metrics to evaluate the quality in medical images, and Chow and Paramesran [27] publish a review and a classification of medical image quality assessment. An improved SSIM quality for compressed medical images was developed by Kumar et al [28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, most sequence development and optimization studies report one or more metrics commonly used by physicists, including SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and modulation transfer function. 47 The correlation between subjective and objective approaches has also been evaluated. 48 To consolidate the strengths of both approaches, we include both subjective and objective metrics relevant to radiotherapy treatment planning in our assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are efforts to effectively model the HVS with an objective approach, 44 46 but optimal solutions have not yet been determined. As such, most sequence development and optimization studies report one or more metrics commonly used by physicists, including SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and modulation transfer function 47 . The correlation between subjective and objective approaches has also been evaluated 48 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are galactophores ducts with abnormalities, such as carcinogenic infiltration [2]. The non-detection of a breast lesion depends not only on the size of the breast or the level of contrast, but also on the sensitivity of the mammograph, as well as the ability of the radiologist who detects them and the conditions under which the radiologist analyze the image [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%