1999
DOI: 10.1117/1.602310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques to eliminate error induced due to acousto-optic modulator vibration in heterodyne interferometry

Abstract: Noise reduction and improved resolution are some serious challenges for precision measurement in the era of nanotechnology. Although several factors that lead to the loss of accuracy in precision measurement system were realized and some were eventually eliminated, some critical factors that were overlooked remain. One such factor, which has become an inherent part of the system, is that caused by the vibration of the acousto optic modulator (AOM) in heterodyne interferometry. We highlight the effect of error … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of the generated signal frequency indicates the stability of the generator. The signal generator used in the experimental device is Gooch & Housego's AODR 97-03307-74 (1040AF-AIF0-0.5) [18], with a center frequency of 40 MHz ± 0.1%, and according to the parameters of the frequency error range of the signal generator, the actual frequency difference ∆ f practical satisfies −0.1% × 40 MHz = −40000 Hz < ∆ f practical < 40000 Hz = +0.1% × 40 MHz (13) Fifty signal acquisition tests in calm environments were executed at different times and locations, and the frequency difference from each test was obtained according to Equation (7), as shown in Appendix A. The average value of all of the frequency differences was −1.896 × 10 −8 Hz, which is negligible.…”
Section: Simulation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The range of the generated signal frequency indicates the stability of the generator. The signal generator used in the experimental device is Gooch & Housego's AODR 97-03307-74 (1040AF-AIF0-0.5) [18], with a center frequency of 40 MHz ± 0.1%, and according to the parameters of the frequency error range of the signal generator, the actual frequency difference ∆ f practical satisfies −0.1% × 40 MHz = −40000 Hz < ∆ f practical < 40000 Hz = +0.1% × 40 MHz (13) Fifty signal acquisition tests in calm environments were executed at different times and locations, and the frequency difference from each test was obtained according to Equation (7), as shown in Appendix A. The average value of all of the frequency differences was −1.896 × 10 −8 Hz, which is negligible.…”
Section: Simulation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent studies of drift error, by B. K. A. Ngoi (1999) [7], L. Qian (2011) [8], and B. Lin (2022) [9], have shown that the instability of the optical shift of the AOFS is a primary cause of signal drift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique measures a lineshape function that convolves technical noise terms with the intrinsic Lorentzian line shape, also called the Schawlow-Townes linewidth, fundamental linewidth, or high frequency equivalent linewidth in literature [5][6][7][8][9]. Technical noise originates from outside the laser cavity and includes factors such as electrical driving noise and environmental noise coupling into the delayed selfheterodyne instrument [10]. These factors can be reduced with sufficient engineering and stabilization techniques for improved long term laser stability and instrument performance at the expense of setup complexity [11,12].…”
Section: Linewidth Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency fluctuation due to the environmental vibration can therefore be partially canceled. 7 Another important component is the coupler. The coupling coefficient directly affects the maximum order of the beat notes we can obtain.…”
Section: ͞Smentioning
confidence: 99%