Techniques of Neutralization: A Brain Network Perspective

Abstract

Sykes and Matza introduced neutralization theory in 1957 to explain how juvenile delinquents retain a positive self-image when engaging in delinquent acts. Since then, aspects of neutralization theory have been incorporated into sociological and criminological theories to explain socially deviant behavior. Functional brain mapping research utilizing advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques has identified complex, intrinsically organized, large-scale brain networks. Higher order operations commonly attributed to three brain networks (default mode network [DMN], central executive network [CEN], salience network [SN]) align closely with neutralization theory. This article briefly discusses brain networks in general and the DMN, CEN, and SN specifically. It also discusses how these networks are involved when engaging in the use of techniques of neutralization and offers implications for future research.

Bridging Neuropsychology and Forensic Psychology: Executive Function Overlaps With the Central Eight Risk and Need Factors

“…The link between social-cognitive theories of criminality and biosocial perspectives is an important consideration in forensics (Beaver, Wright, & DeLisi, 2007;Jantz & Morley, 2018). For example, Newsome and Cullen (2017) applied "biosocial criminology" to Andrews and Bonta's risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model, and the RNR model is arguably the most comprehensive and empirically supported theory of the origins, assessment, and treatment of antisocial behavior (Bonta & Andrews, 2017).…”