Abstract:Temporarily externalizing a segment of tissue is an easy and reliable method for monitoring a buried fasciocutaneous free flap. It is important, however, to avoid obstruction at the perforator level beyond the common source vessels.
“…177 Often, implantable Doppler systems represent the only available form of monitoring in buried flaps, although some authors have reported success with temporarily externalizing implanted flaps (Level V Evidence). 178 Kind et al demonstrated in a series of 147 flaps the implantable Doppler was able to salvage 100 percent of flap take-backs (Level IV Evidence). 179 In a study of 103 patients undergoing 121 microvascular anastomoses, the negative predictive value of the implantable Doppler study system was 100 percent (Level IV Evidence).…”
Microsurgery practice, including preoperative patient selection, intraoperative technique, and anesthetic considerations, varies from institution to institution and from surgeon to surgeon. Many surgeons' practices are driven by "conventional wisdom," which is handed down from mentors to fellows and residents. In this article, the authors explore the oxymoron that there is evidence to support controversy in microsurgery. Indeed, if there was convincing evidence to support varying microsurgery practices, there would be no controversy. The authors conducted a review with a focus on evidence-based medicine to support microsurgery practice.
“…177 Often, implantable Doppler systems represent the only available form of monitoring in buried flaps, although some authors have reported success with temporarily externalizing implanted flaps (Level V Evidence). 178 Kind et al demonstrated in a series of 147 flaps the implantable Doppler was able to salvage 100 percent of flap take-backs (Level IV Evidence). 179 In a study of 103 patients undergoing 121 microvascular anastomoses, the negative predictive value of the implantable Doppler study system was 100 percent (Level IV Evidence).…”
Microsurgery practice, including preoperative patient selection, intraoperative technique, and anesthetic considerations, varies from institution to institution and from surgeon to surgeon. Many surgeons' practices are driven by "conventional wisdom," which is handed down from mentors to fellows and residents. In this article, the authors explore the oxymoron that there is evidence to support controversy in microsurgery. Indeed, if there was convincing evidence to support varying microsurgery practices, there would be no controversy. The authors conducted a review with a focus on evidence-based medicine to support microsurgery practice.
“…Ferguson and Yu [10 ] do recommend that care should be taken not to strangulate the perforator to the externalized component during the placement of this externalized segment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ferguson and Yu [10 ] describe their technique for monitoring buried flaps. They present a case series of 94 free flaps, most of which were anterolateral thigh flaps, used in laryngotracheal and pharyngeal reconstruction.…”
Section: Externalization Of a Component Of The Free Flapmentioning
We provide an overview of recent techniques for free flap monitoring. No single technique provides an ideal method for free flap monitoring, but these methods may prove promising with future research and refinement. New techniques in free flap monitoring largely remain out of the scope of reasonable implementation.
“…Die Autoren glauben jedoch, dass der Nutzen der klinisch einfach umsetzbaren und nicht teuren Hautinsel auch eine sekundäre Entfernungin Lokalanästhesie -rechtfertigt. Sie ermöglicht eine kontinuierliche und für das medizinische Fachpersonal leicht durchführbare Möglichkeit zur Beurteilung der Durchblutung des Transplantates [17]. Zu bedenken bleibt, dass eine Torsion oder Druck auf die Gefäßpedikel der Hautinsel, z.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.