1988
DOI: 10.2307/1551260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques in Lichenometry: Identifying the Yellow Rhizocarpons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific age of the test sites (Table 1) was determined based on following sources of information: (i) lichenometric dating of test sites 1-6 (in AD 2011), based on: (a) measurements of enveloping circles of two hundred sixty relatively circular thalli of the Rhizocarpon subgenus (Benedict 1988), (b) a method of mean of five largest thalli (5LL), (c) a changing growth rate of 0.725 mm year −1 for lichens youn− ger than fifty five years and a rate of 0.585 mm year −1 for older thalli (Thompson and Jones 1986), and (d) a colonisation lag time of ten years; (ii) lichenometric dates pro− vided by Gordon and Sharp (1983) and Evans et al (1999); (iii) historical data pub− lished by Ahlman and Thorarinsson (1937) and Thorarinsson (1943); (iv) glacio− logical measurements of glacier recession along the profile J158 available in the da− tabase of the Icelandic Glaciological Society (Sigurđsson 1998) and performed an− nually in years AD 1930-1995; the measurements were correlated with the position of the glacier snout as shown on aerial photographs taken in AD 1954 and1969; author's own assessment of the most recent position of the glacier snout, based on analysis of aerial photographs, Google Earth imagery and field inspection. Collected data regarding micro−roughness, Schmidt hammer and weathering rind thickness were subject to statistical tests using Statistica 10.0 software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific age of the test sites (Table 1) was determined based on following sources of information: (i) lichenometric dating of test sites 1-6 (in AD 2011), based on: (a) measurements of enveloping circles of two hundred sixty relatively circular thalli of the Rhizocarpon subgenus (Benedict 1988), (b) a method of mean of five largest thalli (5LL), (c) a changing growth rate of 0.725 mm year −1 for lichens youn− ger than fifty five years and a rate of 0.585 mm year −1 for older thalli (Thompson and Jones 1986), and (d) a colonisation lag time of ten years; (ii) lichenometric dates pro− vided by Gordon and Sharp (1983) and Evans et al (1999); (iii) historical data pub− lished by Ahlman and Thorarinsson (1937) and Thorarinsson (1943); (iv) glacio− logical measurements of glacier recession along the profile J158 available in the da− tabase of the Icelandic Glaciological Society (Sigurđsson 1998) and performed an− nually in years AD 1930-1995; the measurements were correlated with the position of the glacier snout as shown on aerial photographs taken in AD 1954 and1969; author's own assessment of the most recent position of the glacier snout, based on analysis of aerial photographs, Google Earth imagery and field inspection. Collected data regarding micro−roughness, Schmidt hammer and weathering rind thickness were subject to statistical tests using Statistica 10.0 software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This subgenus is subdivided into four sections, viz., Superficiale, Alpicola, Viridiatrum and Rhizocarpon (Poelt, 1988). Thalli can be identified to section level fairly easily using the identification criteria suggested by Benedict (1988). Hence, all thalli included in the study were identified as Rhizocarpon section Rhizocarpon (L.) DC., i.e., spores were greater than two-celled, the epihymenium was not black, and the medulla was intense blue/violet when treated with a 1% solution of iodine (Benedict, 1988).…”
Section: Taxonomy Of Rhizocarponmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, each thalli was examined to ensure that it did not comprise two or more intergrown individuals. Identification marks were made with white oil-based paint and Rotring pen, several millimetres away from the edge of the thallus margin (as done by Benedict, 1988;McCarthy, 2003). Each lichen was numbered -GIG01 to GIG41.…”
Section: Non-competing Approximately Circular Rhizocarpon Section Rmentioning
confidence: 99%