2011
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqr018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques for transcribers: assessing and improving consistency in transcripts of spoken language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This test requires the participant to describe what is happening in the picture. The verbal description of the figure was recorded and then transcribed from the MP3 file, following standard procedures 63. In this study, we employed the Cookie Theft narrative test and evaluated a series of linguistic functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test requires the participant to describe what is happening in the picture. The verbal description of the figure was recorded and then transcribed from the MP3 file, following standard procedures 63. In this study, we employed the Cookie Theft narrative test and evaluated a series of linguistic functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cookie Theft descriptions were transcribed following the conventions described by Garrard et al (2011) , and analysed using the method described by Wilson et al (2010) , with minor adaptations as documented in Ahmed et al (2012) . This approach uses the classification of normal and abnormal discourse proposed by Saffran et al (1989) , and uses the quantitative production analysis techniques described by Berndt et al (2000) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects' picture descriptions were transcribed from tape following the conventions set out by Garrard et al 25. The picture description task should ideally elicit a monologue by the subject, but in practice the subject is often heard asking questions about the task (such as ‘is that all right?’) and the examiner supplying comments, prompts or ‘back channel signals’ (such as ‘mmhmm’ or ‘yes’) 26.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%