2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.03.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques for assessment of wear between human cartilage surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate wear features and conditions in synovial joints for OA understanding and assessment, various engineering configurations including wear simulators have been established to simulate real tribological environment and generate desired degrees of wear conditions [45][46][47]. The wear simulator which has been designed and constructed at the Mechanical Engineering workshop, James Cook University (JCU), Australia, was used to perform wear testing on sheep knee joints.…”
Section: Wear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate wear features and conditions in synovial joints for OA understanding and assessment, various engineering configurations including wear simulators have been established to simulate real tribological environment and generate desired degrees of wear conditions [45][46][47]. The wear simulator which has been designed and constructed at the Mechanical Engineering workshop, James Cook University (JCU), Australia, was used to perform wear testing on sheep knee joints.…”
Section: Wear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few studies that do utilize a cartilage-on-cartilage interface do so for studies of friction and/or lubrication[27,28], for comparison against chondroplasty materials[29,30], or for supraphysiological impaction[16]. Third, a final biological concern with many studies is the limited understanding of living cartilage response to tribological stresses as frozen or dead tissue has been typically used[21,31]. Eliminating the biological response from the system provides an incomplete picture of cartilage degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eliminating the biological response from the system provides an incomplete picture of cartilage degradation. Studies may have replicated one or two of the three aspects listed above, such as through the use of dead cartilage-on-cartilage in a pin-on-pin configuration[31] or living tissue with complex compression and shear loading to evaluate gene response[12,32]. However, according to our literature review, no current study has replicated all three aspects together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative observations of cartilage wear debris have been made [815]; however, quantitative measurements of cartilage wear have proven to be more challenging, with only a few studies having reported such measurements. The primary quantitative approaches proposed to date include biochemical assaying of cartilage and test solutions [1620], characterization of changing articular layer thickness [17, 2123], and changes in surface roughness [7, 20, 2428]. One study examining polyethylene wear debris in hip arthroplasty reported the use of an automated particle analyzer [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%