2014
DOI: 10.1177/1535370214529386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques and assays for the study of angiogenesis

Abstract: The importance of studying angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels, is underscored by its involvement in both normal physiology, such as embryonic growth and wound healing, and pathologies, such as diabetes and cancer. Treatments targeting the molecular drive of angiogenesis have been developed, but many of the molecular mechanisms that mediate vascularization, as well as how these mechanisms can be targeted in therapy, remain poorly understood. The limited capacity to quanti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(281 reference statements)
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This short‐term, reproducible assay is commonly used to test how different soluble factors affect tubulogenesis. Limitations of this assay are similar to those in other in vitro models: only certain steps of tissue function are simulated; therefore, the response may not completely reflect how angiogenesis occurs in vivo . HUVECs form tubes when stimulated by VEGF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This short‐term, reproducible assay is commonly used to test how different soluble factors affect tubulogenesis. Limitations of this assay are similar to those in other in vitro models: only certain steps of tissue function are simulated; therefore, the response may not completely reflect how angiogenesis occurs in vivo . HUVECs form tubes when stimulated by VEGF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of this assay are similar to those in other in vitro models: only certain steps of tissue function are simulated; therefore, the response may not completely reflect how angiogenesis occurs in vivo. 33 HUVECs form tubes when stimulated by VEGF. However, increasing doses of gentamicin significantly disrupt the tube-like network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tube formation is one of the preferred methods for testing an angiogenesis response to a single factor because it is short‐term and reproducible. Because this assay is 2‐D, it does not entirely recapitulate in vivo architecture . We showed that CSA‐13‐induced tube formation is inhibited by the VEGFR2 inhibitor ZM 323881, suggesting that CSA‐13 may signal through this receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Angiogenesis is a complex process where many factors influence endothelial cells to sprout and extend . In vitro experiments are sufficient to evaluate single angiogenic factors; however, in vivo experiments should be performed with the peptides to take into account the effect of various cell types such as pericytes, extracellular matrix component, flow, tension, and pressure in the vessel …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 In vitro experiments are sufficient to evaluate single angiogenic factors; however, in vivo experiments should be performed with the peptides to take into account the effect of various cell types such as pericytes, extracellular matrix component, flow, tension, and pressure in the vessel. 42 Insulin, NT, and SP all affected crucial aspects contributing to wound healing despite not being antimicrobial under these conditions. We show that the 2 different peptides NT and insulin decrease TNFα…”
Section: Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%