1993
DOI: 10.1063/1.1144340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technique for measuring thermal diffusivity/conductivity of small thermal-insulator specimens

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inMeasurement of thermal diffusivity of small, high conductivity samples using a phase sensitive technique Rev.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that the magnetite particle absorbs 100% of the power that it intercepts. Since the thermal conductivity of acrylic matrix is kϭ0.14-0.23 W/m K, 16 then for a single nanoparticle with radius of rϭ100 nm we find ⌬T Ϸ2°-3°C which is consistent with our observations ͑Fig. 2͒.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…We assume that the magnetite particle absorbs 100% of the power that it intercepts. Since the thermal conductivity of acrylic matrix is kϭ0.14-0.23 W/m K, 16 then for a single nanoparticle with radius of rϭ100 nm we find ⌬T Ϸ2°-3°C which is consistent with our observations ͑Fig. 2͒.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the temperature range indicated, the thermal diffusivity values decrease from 0.52 (at 191 K) to 0.41 mm-" .s-' (at 423 K) and are approximately 25% smaller then the reference data [12,13,16,17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This procedure was validated with exact solution obtained by Lima e Silva, Duarte and Guimarães (1998). Literature values of α and λ for PVC (Crawford, 1998), for PMMA (Miller and Kotlar, 1991) and for PE (Guimarães, Philippi and Thery, 1995) were used. The difference between the two models is analyzed and the moment the difference begins to increase is determined.…”
Section: Comparison Between Semi-infinite and Finite Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%