1967
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(67)90378-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical result of carotid endarterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Blaisdell et al 6 followed 100 patients over 5 years. Follow-up arteriography, 10-60 days after sur- gery, was available in 95 patients and demonstrated 1 occlusion (1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blaisdell et al 6 followed 100 patients over 5 years. Follow-up arteriography, 10-60 days after sur- gery, was available in 95 patients and demonstrated 1 occlusion (1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our incidence of symptomatic recurrence is 4.5%, while others report between 1% and 7%. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The cause of restenosis is not completely understood. Technical errors at the time of the original operation were thought to be the cause of restenosis in six of our 21 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carried out as a matter of routine, this test provides indication of the need for immediate CE correction in variable though significant percentages, between 5 % and 25 % approximately. 5,8,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] It also permits detection of spasms distal to the arteriotomy, which are a possible cause of acute thrombosis.23…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%