2021
DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjab466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical report and rare case description—patient-specific spacer made of bone cement for the revision of a PSI-TMJ fossa after screw fracture

Abstract: Total alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJ-TJR) has once again become the focus of therapy for end-stage destroyed joints. Although material quality has increased significantly in terms of service life and wear, problems occur even with patient-specific (PSI) prostheses. Here, mainly the ramus components are affected and an occurrence of screw loosening or fractures in the area of the fossa of stock joints is rare and has not yet been described for patient-specific (PSI) components. Although ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, a total of 13 publications including 16 patients were identified by the various search approaches and included in the review (Table 3) (36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48). Four of the patients received an alloplastic reconstruction other than a total joint replacement as a primary treatment following a condylar fracture (36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, a total of 13 publications including 16 patients were identified by the various search approaches and included in the review (Table 3) (36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48). Four of the patients received an alloplastic reconstruction other than a total joint replacement as a primary treatment following a condylar fracture (36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of a total TMJR was found exclusively as a secondary treatment option for condylar fractures. In 9 cases TMJR was done within a time frame greater than 6 months post fracture (39,(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48). Therefore, only three patients (secondarily treated with TMJR within 6 months post fracture) sufficiently met the PICOTS criteria (39)(40)(41).…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%