2015
DOI: 10.5194/bg-12-6721-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: Time lag correction of aquatic eddy covariance data measured in the presence of waves

Abstract: Abstract. Extracting benthic oxygen fluxes from eddy covariance time series measured in the presence of surface gravity waves requires careful consideration of the temporal alignment of the vertical velocity and the oxygen concentration. Using a model based on linear wave theory and measured eddy covariance data, we show that a substantial error in flux can arise if these two variables are not aligned correctly in time. We refer to this error in flux as the time lag bias. In one example, produced with the wave… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In situations with well-defined current, flux estimates can often be improved by applying a time shift correction of the O 2 data relative to the velocity data (Fan et al 1990;McGinnis et al 2008;Lorrai et al 2010). Conversely, in the presence of waves, this correction can introduce substantial biases in the flux estimate (Berg et al 2015). Combined with a generally insignificant flux bias due to temporal sensor signal misalignment found in cospectral analysis of the vertical velocity and the O 2 concentration for selected deployments , this prompted us not to apply any time shift correction.…”
Section: Eddy Flux Extractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situations with well-defined current, flux estimates can often be improved by applying a time shift correction of the O 2 data relative to the velocity data (Fan et al 1990;McGinnis et al 2008;Lorrai et al 2010). Conversely, in the presence of waves, this correction can introduce substantial biases in the flux estimate (Berg et al 2015). Combined with a generally insignificant flux bias due to temporal sensor signal misalignment found in cospectral analysis of the vertical velocity and the O 2 concentration for selected deployments , this prompted us not to apply any time shift correction.…”
Section: Eddy Flux Extractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the technique has previously been successfully applied to investigate benthic oxygen exchange in rivers (Chipman et al 2012;Berg et al 2013;Murniati et al 2015) and impounded riverine systems (McGinnis et al 2008;Lorke et al 2012), it has only very recently been applied to assess seasonal stream metabolism (Koopmans and Berg 2015). General considerations on AEC applications have been extensively evaluated in recent publications (e.g., Lorrai et al 2010;Berg et al 2013;Holtappels et al 2013;Berg et al 2015;Donis et al 2015; see also Methods in this study). However, there are aspects that are of particular relevance for deployments in headwaters and lower order streams that need further consideration.…”
Section: Benthic Oxygen Exchange As Quantified By Aec In Riversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provided the sensor characteristics and measuring conditions the maximum effect was assessed by the procedure described in Berg et al (2015) and amounted to 8 % of the measured flux. However, as the applied sensors will not express maximum stirring sensitivity from all current directions ) the average effect for the respective deployments must have been considerably less.…”
Section: Eddy Covariance Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%