2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: The two step procedure (TSP) for the determination of age at death of adult human remains in forensic cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The two-step procedure (TSP) is a formalised selective approach which advocates the use of the Suchey-Brooks pubic symphysis and Lamendin dentine translucency methods (Brooks and Suchey 1990;Lamendin et al 1992). Here, if the pubic symphysis (which performs best for younger individuals) is recorded as phases I, II or III, the age estimate is taken from just this element; however if scored as IV, V or VI, the dentine translucency method (which performs better on older individuals) is also applied (Baccino et al 2014). Gocha and colleagues (2015) found that using different auricular surface methods alongside the Suchey-Brooks (Brooks and Suchey 1990) pubic symphysis method provided the most accurate results; they recommended using age estimates from Osborne et al (2004) for individuals with a pubic symphysis in stages I to IV, but the Buckberry-Chamberlain (2002) auricular surface method for individuals with a Suchey-Brooks phase V or VI.…”
Section: Combining and Presenting Age Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-step procedure (TSP) is a formalised selective approach which advocates the use of the Suchey-Brooks pubic symphysis and Lamendin dentine translucency methods (Brooks and Suchey 1990;Lamendin et al 1992). Here, if the pubic symphysis (which performs best for younger individuals) is recorded as phases I, II or III, the age estimate is taken from just this element; however if scored as IV, V or VI, the dentine translucency method (which performs better on older individuals) is also applied (Baccino et al 2014). Gocha and colleagues (2015) found that using different auricular surface methods alongside the Suchey-Brooks (Brooks and Suchey 1990) pubic symphysis method provided the most accurate results; they recommended using age estimates from Osborne et al (2004) for individuals with a pubic symphysis in stages I to IV, but the Buckberry-Chamberlain (2002) auricular surface method for individuals with a Suchey-Brooks phase V or VI.…”
Section: Combining and Presenting Age Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of method in the two-step procedure (TSP) is determined by the state of the individual. Baccino et al (2014) suggested a combination of the pubic symphysis method devised by Brooks and Suchey (1990) and the dental method of Lamendin et al (1992), where the individuals falling within the first phases of Brooks and Suchey (1990) are assessed using the former and the individuals in the final phases with the latter. Multifactorial methods, on the other hand, take into account estimations from several methods at once in an attempt to gain a better overall accuracy (İşcan and Loth 1989;Meindl and Russell 1998).…”
Section: Microscopic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, neither approach has a firm statistical leg to stand on. In TSP, the leap from one method to another is unjustified mathematically, while the combination of several age estimation methods with different error structures is equally problematic (Holman et al 2002, 195;Baccino et al 2014). Additionally, neither can address the issue caused by fixed age ranges.…”
Section: Microscopic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age is the most difficult but also the most informative indicator in determining the biological profile. Many techniques have been described to determine the age‐at‐death using teeth , bones, such as pubic symphisis , or both , as well as ribs . Age‐at‐death estimation techniques tend to be less reliable for people beyond the age of 65.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%