2001
DOI: 10.1053/jars.2001.19453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: Resterilizable noninvasive ankle distraction device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…210 The maximum joint distraction has been reported to average 1.3 to 4.5 mm. 108,428 Continuous distraction, however, could possibly lead to more neurovascular complications. 96,108 We prefer an anterior arthroscopy technique without continuous distraction, applying dorsiflexion and plantar flexion as indicated and, if necessary, temporary noninvasive distraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…210 The maximum joint distraction has been reported to average 1.3 to 4.5 mm. 108,428 Continuous distraction, however, could possibly lead to more neurovascular complications. 96,108 We prefer an anterior arthroscopy technique without continuous distraction, applying dorsiflexion and plantar flexion as indicated and, if necessary, temporary noninvasive distraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this part of the procedure a soft tissue distractor may be applied ( Figure 5A). 424,428 It should now be possible to visualise the lesion in the forced plantarfl exed position ( Figure 5B) and to identify the defect by palpating the cartilage with a probe or hook ( Figure 5C). Debridement is performed with use of the bonecutter shaver or a small closed-cup curette ( Figure 5D).…”
Section: Operative Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations