2004
DOI: 10.2458/azu_jrm_v57i6_booth
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Note: Lightweight Camera Stand for Close-to-Earth Remote Sensing

Abstract: Digital photography and subsequent image analysis for ground -cover measurements can increase sampling rate and measurement speed and probably can increase measurement accuracy. Reduced monitoring time (labor cost) can increase monitoring precision by allowing for increased sample numbers. Multiple platforms have been developed for close -to -earth remote sensing. Here we outline a new, 5.8 -kg aluminum camera stand for acquiring stereo imagery from 2 m above ground level. The stand is easily transported to, f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeat photographs of each experimental plot were taken in the same location within each plot biweekly from end of March until end of October from 2007 to 2012 and March–July 2013 using a 2‐m tall camera stand with a 1‐m 2 ground frame (Booth et al . ). In 2008, we were only able to take photographs once per month.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Repeat photographs of each experimental plot were taken in the same location within each plot biweekly from end of March until end of October from 2007 to 2012 and March–July 2013 using a 2‐m tall camera stand with a 1‐m 2 ground frame (Booth et al . ). In 2008, we were only able to take photographs once per month.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Plant cover (percent of ground cover occupied by plants) in each plot was determined by obtaining digital photography from about 2·5 m aboveground in a process similar to that of Booth et al . (). The images were printed and the areas occupied by vegetation and bare ground were manually separated and measured with a CID‐202 laser area meter (CID Bioscience, Camas, WA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The size of understorey vegetation also poses challenges for photographic cover measurement; the camera needs to be positioned high above the ground, and a large area needs to be photographically captured to represent the vegetation; hence, the use of frames or shading devices (e.g. Booth et al. 2004) is impractical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%