2019
DOI: 10.5194/bg-16-3319-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: Interferences of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on methane concentration measurements

Abstract: Abstract. Studies that quantify plant methane (CH4) emission rely on the accurate measurement of small changes in the mixing ratio of CH4 that coincide with much larger changes in the mixing ratio of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Here, we assessed whether 11 commonly occurring VOCs (e.g. methanol, α- and β-pinene, Δ3-carene) interfered with the quantitation of CH4 by five laser-absorption spectroscopy and Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) based CH4 analysers, and quantified the interference… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…What particularly raised our concern regarding the results of the paper by Machacova and coauthors is that they report tree stem CH 4 uptake rates being similar in magnitude to that measured by our group in a mature spruce forest in Sweden, using the same instrumentation (Kohl et al, 2019). In Kohl et al (2019), we quantified the CH 4 fluxes from mature spruce stems by both Gasmet DX4040 and LGR UGGA analysers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…What particularly raised our concern regarding the results of the paper by Machacova and coauthors is that they report tree stem CH 4 uptake rates being similar in magnitude to that measured by our group in a mature spruce forest in Sweden, using the same instrumentation (Kohl et al, 2019). In Kohl et al (2019), we quantified the CH 4 fluxes from mature spruce stems by both Gasmet DX4040 and LGR UGGA analysers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…What particularly raised our concern regarding the results of the paper by Machacova and coauthors is that they report tree stem CH 4 uptake rates being similar in magnitude to that measured by our group in a mature spruce forest in Sweden, using the same instrumentation (Kohl et al, 2019). In Kohl et al (2019), we quantified the CH 4 fluxes from mature spruce stems by both Gasmet DX4040 and LGR UGGA analysers. In contrast with the Gasmet device, the LGR UGGA uses a narrow spectrum infrared laser to measure trace gases based on their absorbance at very specific wavelengths (Baer et al, 2002;Maddaloni et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, we consider them a good conservative estimate for assessing the potential impact of VOC emissions on CH 4 flux measurements. We converted these VOC mixing ratios to apparent CH 4 mixing ratios based on our recent quantification of upper limits to the spectral interference of various VOC in methane mixing ratio measurements with the Picarro G2301 and other methane analysers (Kohl et al, 2019a), using conservative uncertainty limits (±0.4 ppbv apparent CH 4 ppmv −1 methanol and ±0.2 ppbv apparent CH 4 ppmv −1 monoterpenes). Since the spectral interference of acetone was not quantified by Kohl et al (2019a), we applied the higher values value derived from methanol.…”
Section: Assessment Of Measurement Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Care should be taken when measuring in lakes with an anoxic hypolimnion where hydrogen sulfide is likely to accumulate. The performance of Cavity-Ring-Down gas analyzers can be potential affected by organics, ammonia, ethane, ethylene, or sulfur containing compounds (Kohl et al, 2019).…”
Section: Calibration Maintenance and Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%