Technical Note: Evaluation of the WRF-Chem "Aerosol Chemical to Aerosol Optical Properties" Module using data from the MILAGRO campaign

Abstract

Abstract.A comparison between observed aerosol optical properties from the MILAGRO field campaign, which took place in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA) during March 2006, and values simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF-Chem) model, reveals large differences. To help identify the source of the discrepancies, data from the MILAGRO campaign are used to evaluate the "aerosol chemical to aerosol optical properties" module implemented in the full chemistry version of the WRF-Chem model. The evaluation uses measurements of aerosol size distributions and chemical properties obtained at the MILAGRO T1 site. These observations are fed to the module, which makes predictions of various aerosol optical properties, including the scattering coefficient, B scat ; the absorption coefficient, B abs ; and the single-scattering albedo, 0 ; all as a function of time. Values simulated by the module are compared with independent measurements obtained from a photoacoustic spectrometer (PAS) at a wavelength of 870 nm. Because of line losses and other factors, only "fine mode" aerosols with aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 µm are considered here. Over a 10-day period, the simulations of hour-by-hour variations of B scat are not satisfactory, but simulations of B abs and 0 are considerably better. When averaged over the 10-day period, the computed and observed optical properties agree within the uncertainty limits of the measurements and simulations. ues of 0 simulated by the full WRF-Chem model thus cannot be attributed to the "aerosol chemistry to optics" module. The discrepancy is more likely due, in part, to poor characterization of emissions near the T1 site, particularly black carbon emissions.

Online coupled regional meteorology chemistry models in Europe: current status and prospects

“…Some of the online coupled models follow the approach of simulating aerosol radiative properties by calculating complex refractive indices and extinction coefficients of PM and cloud components as a function of size distributions and chemical composition for a specific mixing state by Mie calculations during the model runtime (Barnard et al, 2010). In order to speed up costly calculations of radiative feedbacks, some other radiation modules use externally stored data in the form of a pre-computed parameter cache (e.g.…”

Consistent response of Indian summer monsoon to Middle East dust in observations and simulations

“…Four different aerosol chemical mixing rules are used to calculate the aerosol optical properties: volume approximation, Maxwell-Garnett approximation, exact volume, and exact Maxwell-Garnett schemes (Fast et al, 2006;Barnard et al, 2010). The volume approximation assumption calculates refractive indices based on the volume average of each aerosol species.…”

Inclusion of ash and SO<sub>2</sub> emissions from volcanic eruptions in WRF-Chem: development and some applications

“…These options also include dry deposition, which follows the descriptions given in the original papers (Grell et al, 2005;Fast et al, 2006). The physical and numerical treatment of this interaction (whether using sections, modes, or total mass only) parallels the existing WRF-Chem inclusion of direct aerosol forcing detailed in Fast et al (2006) and Barnard et al (2010) for the MO-SAIC model sectional 8-bin approach. As above, mass concentrations within the lowest 3 volcanic size bins are first mapped onto the corresponding MOSAIC bins between 2.5 and 10 µm dry diameter.…”

“…The numerically very simple and computationally inexpensive bulk approach from the Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport (GOCART, Chin et al, 2002) model is also available in WRF-Chem V3.4. An aerosol optical property module (Fast et al, 2006;Barnard et al, 2010) was added to WRF-Chem that treats bulk, modal, and sectional aerosol size distribution using a similar methodology for refractive indices and multiple mixing rules. The WRF-Chem aerosol modules allow for quantification of the interaction between aerosol and precipitation, such as the first aerosol indirect effect (Twomey, 1977) referring to the modification of the cloud droplet number concentration by aerosols, or the second indirect effect, which was first proposed by Albrecht (1989), who showed that the suppression of precipitation by aerosols could increase cloud water content (or cloud liquid water path, LWP) and fractional cloud cover.…”