2020
DOI: 10.5194/hess-24-1073-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Note: Evaluation of the skill in monthly-to-seasonal soil moisture forecasting based on SMAP satellite observations over the southeastern US

Abstract: Abstract. Providing accurate soil moisture (SM) conditions is a critical step in model initialization in weather forecasting, agricultural planning, and water resources management. This study develops monthly-to-seasonal (M2S) top layer SM forecasts by forcing 1- to 3-month-ahead precipitation forecasts with Noah3.2 Land Surface Model. The SM forecasts are developed over the southeastern US (SEUS), and the SM forecasting skill is evaluated in comparison with the remotely sensed SM observations collected by the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uncertainty in flood predictions arises from multiple sources that include input uncertainty from precipitation predictions, hydrologic model uncertainty, and uncertainty in quantifying the initial conditions (Mazrooei et al., 2021; Mendoza et al., 2012). Efforts have focused on reducing these uncertainties ranging from multi‐model combination (Devineni et al., 2008) on precipitation predictions, on hydrologic models (Singh & Sankarasubramanian, 2014), and through correcting initial conditions through data assimilation (Mazrooei et al., 2020). However, most of these uncertainty reduction techniques have focused primarily on gauged basins with limited/no evaluation of these techniques for ungauged basins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty in flood predictions arises from multiple sources that include input uncertainty from precipitation predictions, hydrologic model uncertainty, and uncertainty in quantifying the initial conditions (Mazrooei et al., 2021; Mendoza et al., 2012). Efforts have focused on reducing these uncertainties ranging from multi‐model combination (Devineni et al., 2008) on precipitation predictions, on hydrologic models (Singh & Sankarasubramanian, 2014), and through correcting initial conditions through data assimilation (Mazrooei et al., 2020). However, most of these uncertainty reduction techniques have focused primarily on gauged basins with limited/no evaluation of these techniques for ungauged basins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty in flood predictions arises from multiple sources that include input uncertainty from precipitation predictions, hydrologic model uncertainty, and uncertainty in quantifying the initial conditions (Mazrooei et al, 2021;Mendoza et al, 2012). Efforts have focused on reducing these uncertainties ranging from multi-model combination (Devineni et al, 2008) on precipitation predictions, on hydrologic models (Singh & Sankarasubramanian, 2014), and through correcting initial conditions through data assimilation (Mazrooei et al, 2020). However, most of these uncertainty reduction techniques have focused primarily on gauged basins with limited/no evaluation of these techniques for ungauged basins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%