2008
DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-273-2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Note: Determination of formaldehyde mixing ratios in air with PTR-MS: laboratory experiments and field measurements

Abstract: Abstract. Formaldehyde (HCHO), the most abundant carbonyl compound in the atmosphere, is generated as an intermediate product in the oxidation of nonmethane hydrocarbons. Proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) has the capability to detect HCHO from ion signals at m/z 31 with high time-resolution. However, the detection sensitivity is low compared to other detectable species, and is considerably affected by humidity, due to back reactions between protonated HCHO and water vapor prior to analysis. W… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
155
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(68 reference statements)
9
155
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope of 1.25 may be a result of contributions to the PTR-MS signal at m/z 31 from compounds other than formaldehyde, including methanol, ethanol, and methyl hydroperoxide (Inomata et al, 2008) and glyoxal (Stonner et al, 2016). The protonated molecular ion signal of ethanol and methyl hydroperoxide cannot be unequivocally identified in the PTR-MS spectra and their concentrations were not determined independently by either the AT-VOC or DNPH method, and consequently their contribution to the m/z 31 signal cannot be determined in this study.…”
Section: Formaldehydementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The slope of 1.25 may be a result of contributions to the PTR-MS signal at m/z 31 from compounds other than formaldehyde, including methanol, ethanol, and methyl hydroperoxide (Inomata et al, 2008) and glyoxal (Stonner et al, 2016). The protonated molecular ion signal of ethanol and methyl hydroperoxide cannot be unequivocally identified in the PTR-MS spectra and their concentrations were not determined independently by either the AT-VOC or DNPH method, and consequently their contribution to the m/z 31 signal cannot be determined in this study.…”
Section: Formaldehydementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interference in the identification and quantification of a target compound in PTR-MS measurements of ambient air can and frequently does occur due to the presence of products from other reaction pathways such as isobaric compounds, fragment ions from other compounds, isotopologues and products of secondary reactions Rogers et al, 2006;Inomata et al, 2008;Dunne et al, 2012;Kaser et al, 2013). When comparing PTR-MS measurements to more selective VOC measurement techniques such as chromatographic methods, the presence of interference in the target ion signal often results in an apparent positive bias in the PTR-MS reported values.…”
Section: Proton-transfer-reaction Mass Spectrometry (Ptr-ms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The concentrations of these individual NMHCs observed in The concentrations of benzene, acetaldehyde, acetone, MVK, and methanol was calibrated by using a ten-VOC premixed standard gas containing toluene (4.98 ppmv), 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (1.01 ppmv), acetonitrile (4.95 ppmv), acetaldehyde (5.04 ppmv), methanol (5.05 ppmv), benzene (5.01 ppmv), acetone (4.99 ppmv), isoprene (4.99 ppmv), p-xylene (4.99 ppmv), and MVK (5.00 ppmv) balanced with N 2 . Formaldehyde concentrations were determined by using the detection sensitivity reported previously (Inomata et al, 2008). For MEK, the volume mixing ratio was calculated theoretically from the equationobtained signal intensity, rate constant, and reaction time for its protonation reaction (Inomata et al, 2010;Kudo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Observations and Model Simulation Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%