2021
DOI: 10.5194/hess-2021-515
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Note: Data assimilation and autoregression for using near-real-time streamflow observations in long short-term memory networks

Abstract: Abstract. Ingesting near-real-time observation data is a critical component of many operational hydrological forecasting systems. In this paper we compare two strategies for ingesting near-real-time streamflow observations into Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) rainfall-runoff models: autoregression (a forward method) and variational data assimilation. Autoregression is both more accurate and more computationally efficient than data assimilation. Autoregression is sensitive to missing data, however an appropriate … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, deep learning (DL) approaches have proven to be a promising tool in modeling hydrologic dynamics (Shen, 2018; Shen & Lawson, 2021; Sit et al., 2020). Among these, long short‐term memory (LSTM) networks (Hochreiter & Schmidhuber, 1997) present excellent performance in modeling soil moisture (Fang et al., 2017, 2019), streamflow (Feng et al., 2020; Frame et al., 2021; Gauch, Kratzert, et al., 2021; Ha et al., 2021; Kratzert et al., 2019; Nearing, Klotz, et al., 2021; Xiang & Demir, 2020), water table depth (Zhang et al., 2018), water quality variables such as water temperature (Rahmani et al., 2020, 2021) and dissolved oxygen (Zhi et al., 2021), and reservoir modulation (Ouyang et al., 2021). DL can be adapted for tasks like uncertainty quantification (Fang et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021), data assimilation (Fang & Shen, 2020; Feng et al., 2020), and multiscale modeling (Liu et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, deep learning (DL) approaches have proven to be a promising tool in modeling hydrologic dynamics (Shen, 2018; Shen & Lawson, 2021; Sit et al., 2020). Among these, long short‐term memory (LSTM) networks (Hochreiter & Schmidhuber, 1997) present excellent performance in modeling soil moisture (Fang et al., 2017, 2019), streamflow (Feng et al., 2020; Frame et al., 2021; Gauch, Kratzert, et al., 2021; Ha et al., 2021; Kratzert et al., 2019; Nearing, Klotz, et al., 2021; Xiang & Demir, 2020), water table depth (Zhang et al., 2018), water quality variables such as water temperature (Rahmani et al., 2020, 2021) and dissolved oxygen (Zhi et al., 2021), and reservoir modulation (Ouyang et al., 2021). DL can be adapted for tasks like uncertainty quantification (Fang et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021), data assimilation (Fang & Shen, 2020; Feng et al., 2020), and multiscale modeling (Liu et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many ML studies use readily available off‐the‐shelf products such as the catchment attributes and meteorology for large‐sample studies (CAMELS; Addor et al, 2017), which may impair their extensibility to practical, realistic applications where such data may not be available. Assimilation of new data into models using methods such as ensemble Kalman filters and autoregression (Brajard et al, 2020; Nearing, Klotz, et al, 2021; Zwart et al, 2021), and the use of integrated datasets tailored for the problem can improve prediction outcomes. Software that synthesize data for on‐demand queries such as brokering‐based tools (Horsburgh et al, 2016; Varadharajan et al, 2022), and methods to streamline quality control and outlier detection, gap‐fill, downscale observations, and determine parameters for process models (Bennett & Nijssen, 2021; Campbell et al, 2013; Hill & Minsker, 2010; Leigh et al, 2019; Mital et al, 2020; Russo et al, 2020) would ideally be integrated into ML workflows in parallel with advances in modelling approaches.…”
Section: Opportunities For Advancement Of Water Quality MLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the watershed). In addition to watershed delineations and precipitation estimates, they typically require data on both timevarying parameters (or forcing data) like temperature, humidity, soil moisture, and vegetation as well as static watershed properties like topography, soil type, or land use/land cover (Gauch et al, 2021;Kratzert et al, 2019Kratzert et al, , 2021Nearing et al, 2021). The rabpro API enables users to manage the complete data pipeline necessary to drive such a model starting from the initial watershed delineation through the calculation of static and time-varying parameters.…”
Section: Statement Of Needmentioning
confidence: 99%