1982
DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1982.1878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical NOTE.A Finite Element Model for the in-Plane Behaviour of Brickwork.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In preliminary research, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] analyzed the behavior of this masonry for several stress orientations with regard to the bed joints. In [27,28], it was concluded that, for normal and perpendicular stress, the stress-strain behavior was similar. The arrangement of the leaves in the thin-tile masonry could allow considering it as a particular case of masonry loaded parallel to the bed joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In preliminary research, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] analyzed the behavior of this masonry for several stress orientations with regard to the bed joints. In [27,28], it was concluded that, for normal and perpendicular stress, the stress-strain behavior was similar. The arrangement of the leaves in the thin-tile masonry could allow considering it as a particular case of masonry loaded parallel to the bed joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, behavioral models of masonry materials with homogeneous properties were developed, ignoring the effects of mortar bonds (while are able to model local failures) [3]. This process led to suggest a nonlinear finite element model for the behavior of masonry materials based on biaxial experiments on masonry assemblages [4]. This model is capable to consider nonlinear effects of materials and also progressive local failures [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setback of such a level of detail is the large number of input parameters required [41] and the intense computational effort associated [42], thus limiting their application to small scale studies [43][44][45][46][47][48]. In contrast, macro-scale approaches [49][50][51][52][53][54] using continuum FE are associated with low computational effort as URM is represented by a homogenous material whose behaviour is specified by closed form laws. Yet, closed form solutions often need to be validated (or calibrated) with experimental data obtained either from in-situ or laboratory experimental investigations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%