Gilbert Simondon 2013
DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748677214.003.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Technical Mentality’ Revisited: Brian Massumi on Gilbert Simondon

Abstract: Parrhesia Several years ago, you already tried to get Simondon translated-and to no avail. We thought we could start with the question: why Simondon today? One can see why it would be important, historically, that Simondon is finally translated into English. But is there any reason why his thought strikes you as particularly relevant-philosophically, politically, culturally-today? Brian Massumi I did make strenuous efforts over a number of years, starting almost twenty years ago, to have Simondon translated fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that Cassirer is sometimes accused of being too much of an epistemologist 10 and despite the fact that Simondon is sometimes claimed to treat epistemology as a mere function of ontology (De Boever et al 2009), Simondon follows Cassirer's point regarding the lawfulness embedded in technology. Simondon even goes so far as to insist that an investigation of technology's mode of existence is always simultaneously epistemological (Simondon 1958, p. 255).…”
Section: The Ontological Force Of Technicitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite the fact that Cassirer is sometimes accused of being too much of an epistemologist 10 and despite the fact that Simondon is sometimes claimed to treat epistemology as a mere function of ontology (De Boever et al 2009), Simondon follows Cassirer's point regarding the lawfulness embedded in technology. Simondon even goes so far as to insist that an investigation of technology's mode of existence is always simultaneously epistemological (Simondon 1958, p. 255).…”
Section: The Ontological Force Of Technicitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…So much so that Massumi can even speak of 'future causes' (De Boever et al, 2012), and to great effect in terms of designing. He explains:…”
Section: Scenarios Styledmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ezra Pound's valorization in the ABC of Reading of "inventors" whose "extant work gives us the first known example of a [new] process" over "masters" (who exploit inventions perhaps better than the inventors) and "diluters" (just okay) is also apposite [7]. Simondon's own notion of "invention" verges on the definition of "discovery," as one simply can't invent without "capitalizing [on] natural forces, laws, principles, materials and their potential modes and transformation" [8]. Most importantly, Simondon understand invention as a form of thought itself:…”
Section: Toy Made Out Of Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discontinuous invention is that in which the technical object really "concretizes" itself as reality of a progress, such as the invention of the diesel engine within the technical essence of the "internal combustion engine." [8] That is, a new essence, the "internal combustion engine," is introduced by the inventor and goes through a continuous process of improvement, ultimately converging with other technical essences (machines exploiting diesel fuel) and making the discontinuous leap into the new individual, the diesel engine.…”
Section: Toy Made Out Of Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%