2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12253-008-9111-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Feasibility of Transperineal MR-Guided Prostate Interventions in a Low-Field Open MRI Unit: Canine Study

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides superior visualization of the prostate, its substructure, surrounding tissues, and, most important, focal lesions or cancer. The purpose of our canine study was to demonstrate the feasibility of a low-field (0.35 T) transperineal system that enables precise MR image guidance of prostate interventions. The canines were placed in the right lateral decubitus position. Template reconstruction, trajectory planning, contouring were based on T2-weighted FSE images. For image … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported mean errors of coaxial needle placements during transperineal MR-guided biopsy [14,17] ranged from 2.1 to 6.93 mm. In our previous canine study the average needle accuracy of 37 insertions experienced was 2.9 mm, with the maximum error of 4.5 mm [21]. In the human study we could adequately reproduce these results (mean: 2.9 mm, maximum error: 5 mm) with the exception that we chose to analyze the plastic catheter tip deviations, instead of metallic ones for three main reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reported mean errors of coaxial needle placements during transperineal MR-guided biopsy [14,17] ranged from 2.1 to 6.93 mm. In our previous canine study the average needle accuracy of 37 insertions experienced was 2.9 mm, with the maximum error of 4.5 mm [21]. In the human study we could adequately reproduce these results (mean: 2.9 mm, maximum error: 5 mm) with the exception that we chose to analyze the plastic catheter tip deviations, instead of metallic ones for three main reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the frame of our MR-guided prostate intervention program we have initiated a three phases -gel phantom, cadaver and healthy caninestudy to develop a methodology for MR-guided high-doserate (HDR) prostate BT focusing on image quality [21]. The excellent preliminary results facilitated us to introduce this method into the clinical practice.…”
Section: Hdrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In prostate BT, it is usually accepted that the target volume is the whole prostate, but with respect to the homogeneity of the dose distribution there are significant differences in the literature [28]. Several implantation techniques exist according to the number and placement of needles [3,7,11,12,21,[29][30][31]. By placing a few needles peripherally, the dose is larger in the peripheral zone, while distributing more needles uniformly the whole prostate can be irradiated more homogeneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to US, MRI provides excellent visualization of the prostate gland with its substructures, focal lesions within the gland, and surrounding periprostatic tissues, and is widely believed to be the ideal modality for imaging prostate cancer (Beyersdorff et al 2002). In the recent years, researchers have been investigating the clinical utility of MRI for targeted biopsy by fusing the preprocedurally acquired MRI with the intra-procedural US (Ukimura et al 2010, Natarajan et al 2011) or by means of intraoperative MRI for needle and anatomy visualization (Cormack et al 2000, D’Amico et al 2000, Hata et al 2001, Beyersdorff et al 2002, Susil et al 2003, Susil et al 2004, Menard et al 2004, Krieger et al 2005, Zangos et al 2005, Susil et al 2006, Engelhard et al 2006, Blumenfeld et al 2007, de Oliveira et al 2008, Hambrock et al 2008, Rea et al 2008, Lakosi et al 2009, Oguro et al 2009, Menard et al 2010, Menard et al 2011, Yakar et al 2011, Zangos et al 2011, Schouten et al 2012). While US-guided biopsy has been emerging because of its availability, portability, and the recent progress in imaging quality of US, MRI-guided biopsy has the advantages of better soft tissue contrast and applicability to patients who cannot undergo TRUS-guided biopsy due to previous total colectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%