2018
DOI: 10.2172/1434251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Feasibility of Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) Utilizing a Porous Rock Reservoir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The King Island project in California demonstrated the technical feasibility of using an abandoned natural gas reservoir for a 300 MW, 10 h CAES facility, with the reservoir capable of accommodating the flow rates and pressures necessary for the operation of the facility. Originally planned for opening around 2020, its progress appears stalled due to the high cost of a CAES facility relative to alternative energy storage technologies [27]. All test facilities encountered problems with one of more of the following: wells and economics, pressure anomalies, variations in reservoir quality and performance, formation of the 'air bubble' in the storage reservoir, and reaction between the oxygen of the injected air and minerals in the reservoir rock leading to oxygen depletion and/or potential for bacterial/micro-organism growth and porosity reduction.…”
Section: Caes-geological Storage Options Developments and Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The King Island project in California demonstrated the technical feasibility of using an abandoned natural gas reservoir for a 300 MW, 10 h CAES facility, with the reservoir capable of accommodating the flow rates and pressures necessary for the operation of the facility. Originally planned for opening around 2020, its progress appears stalled due to the high cost of a CAES facility relative to alternative energy storage technologies [27]. All test facilities encountered problems with one of more of the following: wells and economics, pressure anomalies, variations in reservoir quality and performance, formation of the 'air bubble' in the storage reservoir, and reaction between the oxygen of the injected air and minerals in the reservoir rock leading to oxygen depletion and/or potential for bacterial/micro-organism growth and porosity reduction.…”
Section: Caes-geological Storage Options Developments and Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that significant displacement of the rock formations would be induced during the formation of initial bubble. Before starting system design, air injection testing is required to obtain data on flow dynamics and rock mechanics [72].…”
Section: Analytical and Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2009, a 300-MW-by-10-hour CAES project was proposed by Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) to investigate promising technologies that could provide operational flexibility for integrating intermittent renewable resources and balancing supply and demand [72]. Firstly, possible underground storage reservoirs in California, US were examined by considering geological factors such as reservoir size, permeability, porosity, depth/pressure, reservoir thickness, remaining reserves, and trapping mechanism.…”
Section: Technical Feasibility Verified By Using Depleted Gas Reservo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation