1988
DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(88)90267-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical factors related to Herbert screw fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Screw stabilization is also thought to enable early physiotherapy and improve functional outcomes; however, the operative procedure is technically demanding and requires considerable individual experience. The procedure is further associated with quite high levels of intraoperative radiation exposure and screw misplacement rates of up to 5-30% [2][3][4][5]. Navigated procedures have recently been described as suitable tools for guiding percutaneous screw placement into the scaphoid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screw stabilization is also thought to enable early physiotherapy and improve functional outcomes; however, the operative procedure is technically demanding and requires considerable individual experience. The procedure is further associated with quite high levels of intraoperative radiation exposure and screw misplacement rates of up to 5-30% [2][3][4][5]. Navigated procedures have recently been described as suitable tools for guiding percutaneous screw placement into the scaphoid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique also risks screw penetration of the joint (27). Mores ignificantly it has been observed that screws implanted along the central scaphoid axis resulted in faster healing (28,29,30). Using av olar approach, only an osteotomy and removal of the dorsal trapezium permit accurate placement of aguidewirev olarly with or without ag uidance jig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with avascular necrosis were not included in this difficult subset as vascularised bone grafts would be our first treatment in these patients [38]. Technical difficulties have been previously noted by many authors in the insertion of compression screws for scaphoid non-unions, especially when there is a cavitary or humpback deformity of the remaining un-united native scaphoid [1,16,36]. It is our experience that the insertion of a compression screw device is not necessary to achieve scaphoid union; furthermore, the routine use of such a device might lead to an increased number of bone grafts becoming either displaced (usually in a volar direction) or compressed, with resultant loss of scaphoid height/length and associated disruption to normal carpal mechanics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%