2002
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/48.7.1077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Evaluation of a New Immunoradiometric and a New Immunoluminometric Assay for Thyroglobulin

Abstract: Background: After removal of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), serum thyroglobulin (Tg) can indicate persistent or recurrent disease. We describe two novel two-step assays designed to measure low Tg concentrations. Methods: We evaluated prototypes of the new IRMA, DYNOtest® Tg-pluS, and the new immunoluminometric assay (ILMA), LUMItest® Tg-pluS. In the first step, a high-salt incubation buffer leads to dissociation of Tg-Tg antibody complexes in serum and is intended to reduce nonspecific … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
18
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The hook effect is a feature common to all immunoassays that can occur in the presence of very high antigen levels (10–10 000 times the upper limit of the assay range) resulting in the binding capacity of antibody for the solid support being exceeded resulting in a false‐negative result 16 . The hook effect may potentially affect Tg and TgAb measurements, however in the case of Tg measurements in our study, this is felt very unlikely as the postablative and diagnostic I‐131 patients would not be expected to have particularly high Tg levels in the post‐thyroidectomy/ablative I‐131 setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hook effect is a feature common to all immunoassays that can occur in the presence of very high antigen levels (10–10 000 times the upper limit of the assay range) resulting in the binding capacity of antibody for the solid support being exceeded resulting in a false‐negative result 16 . The hook effect may potentially affect Tg and TgAb measurements, however in the case of Tg measurements in our study, this is felt very unlikely as the postablative and diagnostic I‐131 patients would not be expected to have particularly high Tg levels in the post‐thyroidectomy/ablative I‐131 setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Stimulated Tg values higher than 0·2 ng/ml measured 12 months after thyroid ablation were considered positive for persisting/relapsing disease. 9,10 The presence of anti-Tg antibodies (AbTg) was screened by a specific radioimmunoassay (DYNOtest® anti-TGn, BRAHMS Diagnostica GmbH) and by recovery test with a specific Tg-recovery buffer provided by the producer. Sera showing AbTg levels > 60 U/ml and/or recover < 80% or > 120% were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Serum Tg Assay and Screening For Interferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9] Recently, several highly sensitive Tg assays have been developed, yet their real clinical benefit still remains undetermined. [10][11][12][13][14][15] The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of Tg measured by a highly sensitive (functional sensitivity 0·1 µ g/l) automated Tg assay in a group of 160 DTC-treated patients, submitted to routine follow-up that included neck ultrasonography (US), 131 I whole body scanning, Tg measurement during L-thyroxine (L-T4) suppressive therapy, and after rh-TSH stimulation. The results were compared to those obtained with a routinely employed Tg assay, with a functional sensitivity that satisfies all the criteria required by the NACB guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%