2007
DOI: 10.2989/ajas.2007.32.1.8.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical efficiency of small-scale fishing households in Tanzanian coastal villages: an empirical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
30
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, fishers using non‐motorized boats tend to be less efficient than those with motorized boats, mainly because fishers using non‐motorized boats cannot sail for long distances and increase their Nile perch catch, thereby constraining fishers to fish at optimum points. Sesabo and Tol () also found that fishers travelling long distances to access fishing grounds tend to be more efficient than their counterparts. This observation is consistent with the study of Mome and Arnason (), indicating the harvesting efficiency of non‐motorized boats was about half that of the motorized boats, the latter reducing the sailing time to reach fishing grounds and obtain big fish catches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, fishers using non‐motorized boats tend to be less efficient than those with motorized boats, mainly because fishers using non‐motorized boats cannot sail for long distances and increase their Nile perch catch, thereby constraining fishers to fish at optimum points. Sesabo and Tol () also found that fishers travelling long distances to access fishing grounds tend to be more efficient than their counterparts. This observation is consistent with the study of Mome and Arnason (), indicating the harvesting efficiency of non‐motorized boats was about half that of the motorized boats, the latter reducing the sailing time to reach fishing grounds and obtain big fish catches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The measure of return to scale (RTS) represents the percentage change in output attributable to a proportional change in the use of all inputs, which is estimated as the sum of the output elasticities for all inputs. Thus, if RTS > 1, RTS = 1 or RTS < 1, one has increasing, constant or decreasing returns to scale, respectively (Ehiakpor et al, ; Sesabo & Tol, ). Following the approach of Sesabo and Tol, (), Hamidi () and Ehiakpor et al (), the specification of the input elasticity is presented as follows:ej=ln(yi)ln(xji)=βj+j=1j=6βitalicjhlnxj+βitalicjt=βj…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Econometric results often lend support to a translog specification, with unrestricted elasticity parameters of substitution between inputs (and between outputs in multi-species fisheries), as opposed to nested specifications (e.g. see Basch et al, 2003 andSesabo andTol, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, an aggregate value of a multi-species catch as output measure (as used by some studies based on stochastic frontier models, e.g. Sesabo and Tol, 2007) does not allow a distinction between allocative and technical efficiency, unless dual functions (including costs) are used. Since most fishing gear is not highly species-selective and price expectations are often inaccurate, both biases should partly level out if sufficient time and vessel aggregation is used (e.g.…”
Section: Revisions and Empirical Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation