2016 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/mtd.2016.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Debt Indexes Provided by Tools: A Preliminary Discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we aim to define a new technical debt index more focused on architectural issues [14]. We currently detect only three AS, we are interested to detect other architectural smells, also not strictly related to dependency issues and include a new component devoted to the suggestion of the refactoring steps to remove the architectural smells, since their refactoring could be a critical task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we aim to define a new technical debt index more focused on architectural issues [14]. We currently detect only three AS, we are interested to detect other architectural smells, also not strictly related to dependency issues and include a new component devoted to the suggestion of the refactoring steps to remove the architectural smells, since their refactoring could be a critical task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different quality or technical debt indexes have been defined in the literature to evaluate a project, as the old Maintainability Index of Coleman [14]. We briefly cite below the indexes provided by some tools, while a more extended description of some of them can be found in [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different tools for software analysis, in particular commercial ones, provide a large number of evaluation measures through the computation of several metrics and technical debt indexes. In a previous paper [7], we briefly described five tools (SonarGraph, Structure101, Cast, InFusion, SonarQube) able to provide a Technical Debt Index, sometimes called in a different way, but with the same or similar purpose. We found that often architectural issues are not taken into account and when they are considered the main focus is on the detection of cyclic dependencies [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large volume of potential metrics and techniques that have not been used yet for estimating TD, and which could potentially increase the completeness of the TD estimation concept. In addition, most of the already existing tools provide different TD indexes [63], creating confusion in the community about which of the current metrics should be selected, or how they should be combined [64].…”
Section: Open Issues and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%