The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical considerations for closing secundum atrial septal defect in the small child with the HELEX septal occluder via transhepatic access

Abstract: We describe closure of an atrial septal defect in a symptomatic 4.6 kg child with the HELEX Septal Occluder (W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) via transhepatic approach. Technical considerations are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transhepatic approach has also been described for atrial septal defect occlusion in small infants, including using the HELEX Septal Occluder in a 4.9-kg patient. 5 The potential advantage is that the delivery catheter approaches the atrial septal defect in a more perpendicular manner and may allow the left atrial disc to deploy more parallelly to the atrial septum; however, we ultimately felt that using the femoral venous approach was feasible and safe. We did note in both patients that during deployment the atrial septum and device were pulled caudal and repositioned upon setting the locking loop; however, this did not result in any haemodynamic instability or arrhythmias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transhepatic approach has also been described for atrial septal defect occlusion in small infants, including using the HELEX Septal Occluder in a 4.9-kg patient. 5 The potential advantage is that the delivery catheter approaches the atrial septal defect in a more perpendicular manner and may allow the left atrial disc to deploy more parallelly to the atrial septum; however, we ultimately felt that using the femoral venous approach was feasible and safe. We did note in both patients that during deployment the atrial septum and device were pulled caudal and repositioned upon setting the locking loop; however, this did not result in any haemodynamic instability or arrhythmias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not have any difficulty achieving haemostasis from the venous puncture site upon completion of the procedure, and neither patient had any evidence of venous occlusion or venous stasis in the lower extremity during follow-up. The transhepatic approach has also been described for atrial septal defect occlusion in small infants, including using the HELEX Septal Occluder in a 4.9-kg patient 5 . The potential advantage is that the delivery catheter approaches the atrial septal defect in a more perpendicular manner and may allow the left atrial disc to deploy more parallelly to the atrial septum; however, we ultimately felt that using the femoral venous approach was feasible and safe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percutaneous femoral venous access is widely accepted as the standard approach for transcatheter ASD closure. However, this approach tends to be abandoned when interruption of the IVC is encountered, in favor of transjugular access [4, 5] or transhepatic puncture [6–11]. There has only been one previous publication describing successful transfemoral device closure of a small ASD in a case of interrupted IVC in an adult [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%