1996
DOI: 10.1093/wjaf/11.3.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Commentary: A Structural Classification for Inland Northwest Forest Vegetation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Refined definitions based on regional inventories incorporating the full range of potential structural conditions have the potential to avoid confusion that has occurred in the past regarding policy and management (Parker et al 2000, Spies 2004). Our results also clearly show that the relationship between stand age and structural development does not apply to all ''old'' forests, especially those in low productivity or frequently disturbed environments (O'Hara et al 1996). The general model of stand development from the western hemlock zone that emphasizes development of high live and dead biomass and canopy layering is not necessarily a good basis for assessment and conservation of ''older'' forest in other vegetation zones.…”
Section: Implications For Conservation and Managementmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Refined definitions based on regional inventories incorporating the full range of potential structural conditions have the potential to avoid confusion that has occurred in the past regarding policy and management (Parker et al 2000, Spies 2004). Our results also clearly show that the relationship between stand age and structural development does not apply to all ''old'' forests, especially those in low productivity or frequently disturbed environments (O'Hara et al 1996). The general model of stand development from the western hemlock zone that emphasizes development of high live and dead biomass and canopy layering is not necessarily a good basis for assessment and conservation of ''older'' forest in other vegetation zones.…”
Section: Implications For Conservation and Managementmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Oliver's stages were as follows: stand initiation (si), closed canopy-stem exclusion (secc), understory re-initiation (ur), and old growth. We expanded their classification to seven classes, in order to include conditions characteristic of stand development in Interior Northwest forests with their frequent disturbance (see O'Hara et al 1996). Additional structural classes (SCs) were: open canopy-stem exclusion (seoc), young forest multistory (yfms), and old forest-single story (ofss).…”
Section: Classifying Forest Composition Structure and Potential Vegmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as climate change progresses and summers in the boreal region become drier and warmer, the wildfire season is predicted to become even longer and more severe (Balshi et al., ; Fauria & Johnson, ; Littell et al., ), with more frequent fires burning larger areas at higher severity (Hessburg et al., ). Not only will this ongoing regime shift cause more lynx habitat to revert to the open stand‐initiation stages (O'Hara, Latham, Hessburg, & Smith, ) that snowshoe hares and lynx generally avoid, but also higher severity burns may homogenize areas within a burn perimeter so that the residual trees and fire skips lynx select are less abundant (Cansler & McKenzie, ). Additionally, climate change may also degrade regenerating lynx habitat in burns as warmer and drier summers will likely hinder the regeneration of dense forest stands (Littell et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%