1983
DOI: 10.2172/713558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical basis for storage of Zircaloy-clad spent fuel in inert gases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• C to avoid controversies [8]. Once sealed in the canister, there is no possibility of monitoring the evolution of the fuel assembly inside the canister, and to verify the state, the canister has to be opened.…”
Section: Behaviour Of Spent Fuel Assembliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• C to avoid controversies [8]. Once sealed in the canister, there is no possibility of monitoring the evolution of the fuel assembly inside the canister, and to verify the state, the canister has to be opened.…”
Section: Behaviour Of Spent Fuel Assembliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this worst case scenario, the temperature might be sufficiently high and the oxygen sufficiently plentiful for the spent fuel cladding to fail 10 . Cladding failure would, in turn, cause oxidation of the UO 2 fuel to U 3 O 8 which would result in splitting of the cladding and crumbling of the pellets into powder.…”
Section: Projection Of Operating Environment For Waste Package Basketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release of 85Kr to the cask was essentiallylinear during the 2.5 months of testing and indicatesthat the defect in the cladding was very small. The krypton releases during the REA 2023 cask test are compared in Figure 3.6 with the 85Kr releases observed in assembly B02 in the Fuel Temperature Test (FTT)(Johnson and Gilbert 1983) that was conducted to assess dry storage of spent fuel. The backgroundlevel (3.086 x°I0-8 Ci) in the FTT, I% release of the 85Kr produced in a single fuel rod, and 20% release of the 85Kr produced in a single fuel rod are plotted inFigure 3…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%