2013
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical assistance to the Commission (Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002) for the preparation of a data collection system of welfare indicators in EU broilers’ slaughterhouses

Abstract: Council Directive 2007/43/EC on the protection of chickens kept for meat production requires Member States to submit to the Commission the results of a data collection of welfare indicators in broiler slaughterhouses. The Commission prepared a draft document for a harmonised data collection system of welfare indicators in broiler slaughterhouses for a one-year period and requested EFSA to assess whether the sample size chosen in the document would be sufficient to achieve the objectives of the data collection.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A scoring system of 0–2 had already been developed (Ekstrand et al., 1998 ; Berg and Algers, 2004 ; Welfare Quality Network, 2019 ). However, as part of work related to the Implementation of Article 6.2 of Council Directive 2007/42/EC 20 more details on the assessment rules for each level were proposed and slightly revised definitions were suggested by EFSA (EFSA, 2013 ). These revised definitions were based on research on the 0–2 scoring system and another scoring system with a 5‐point scale (Michel et al., 2012 ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A scoring system of 0–2 had already been developed (Ekstrand et al., 1998 ; Berg and Algers, 2004 ; Welfare Quality Network, 2019 ). However, as part of work related to the Implementation of Article 6.2 of Council Directive 2007/42/EC 20 more details on the assessment rules for each level were proposed and slightly revised definitions were suggested by EFSA (EFSA, 2013 ). These revised definitions were based on research on the 0–2 scoring system and another scoring system with a 5‐point scale (Michel et al., 2012 ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that feet can be scored from birds on the moving line or scored later, e.g. from a box, after the feet have been separated from the bird (EFSA, 2013 ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, within the context of industrial agriculture scenarios, Nobil et al [24] and Nobil et al [26] mentioned that slaughter plants kill animals in a limited predetermined age range. However, the European Food Safety Authority [29] states that there exists a disparity between the United States and European countries in terms of typical slaughter ages, with the former commonly observing a slaughter age of 47 days, while the latter adheres to a slaughter age of 42 days. Moreover, Park et al [30] mentioned that the slaughter age should be at least 30 days.…”
Section: Solution Procedures and Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%