1995
DOI: 10.3397/1.3703014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical assessment of the effect of regulations on road vehicle noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several investigations during the nineties have shown undoubtedly that the decrease in noise emission from passenger cars on motorways and urban expressways ranges from 0 to 1 dB(A), while the decrease of noise emission of trucks ranges from 2 to 4.5 dB(A). [2][3][4] Both figures are much smaller than the reductions that have been achieved in the tests. The explanations for these astonishing facts are discussed below.…”
Section: Historic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Several investigations during the nineties have shown undoubtedly that the decrease in noise emission from passenger cars on motorways and urban expressways ranges from 0 to 1 dB(A), while the decrease of noise emission of trucks ranges from 2 to 4.5 dB(A). [2][3][4] Both figures are much smaller than the reductions that have been achieved in the tests. The explanations for these astonishing facts are discussed below.…”
Section: Historic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This method is receiving increasingly serious criticism for regulating noise emission inef ciently. In an extensive evaluation of the effect of emission limits, made by a working party under l-INCE [1], it was concluded that only minor parts of the nominal tightenings of noise limits were effective as environmental improvements. Therefore, it was recommended that "A new measuring procedure for use during type approval of vehicles shall be developed.…”
Section: Sandberymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…trucks are loaded). Since noise reductions measured in actual traf c appear to be more signi cant in Japan than in Europe, it may be that the use of a more realistic driving condition during type approval is one of the main reasons [1].…”
Section: Sandberymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been thoroughly discussed by an international working party established by l-INCE in 1992. Their nal report [1] identilied the main reasons. Among them: lack of realism and representativin at driving conditions in the type approval lest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%