2006
DOI: 10.2989/10295920609505263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical and institutional capacity in local organisations to manage decentralised forest resources in Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there have been many attempts at collaborative forest management among users, local governments, NGOs, CBOs and the central government, results have been consistently disappointing. Although partnerships enhance local management potential, financial and legal means to implement local resource extraction policies are lacking (Turyahabwe et al 2006). There are weak relationships between local institutions and centrally devised policy (Turyahabwe et al 2007;Hartter and Ryan 2010) and between people's perceptions and actual uses of forest resources (Watkins 2009a(Watkins , 2009b.…”
Section: Case I: Uganda's Forestry Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been many attempts at collaborative forest management among users, local governments, NGOs, CBOs and the central government, results have been consistently disappointing. Although partnerships enhance local management potential, financial and legal means to implement local resource extraction policies are lacking (Turyahabwe et al 2006). There are weak relationships between local institutions and centrally devised policy (Turyahabwe et al 2007;Hartter and Ryan 2010) and between people's perceptions and actual uses of forest resources (Watkins 2009a(Watkins , 2009b.…”
Section: Case I: Uganda's Forestry Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chi-square and Bonferroni tests were used to analyse associations between respondents" age and lack of interest in participating in forest management. The Pearson chi-square was used where the expected cell frequency was ≥5, while M-L chi-square was used when the expected cell frequencies were lower than 5 (Turyahabwe et al, 2006). However, to identify variables that were independent predictors of participation in forest management, we used logistic regressions from which the estimated odds ratios (y) were derived to ascertain the effects of the predictors on respondents" participation in forest management.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meaningful participation in forest management requires that households should have adequate capacity to manage forest resources. Turyahabwe et al (2006) described capacity as possession of the appropriate legal framework, knowledge, skills and abilities to fulfil a given role. We examined the educational level as an enabler of that capacity.…”
Section: Capacity To Participate In Sustainable Forest Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The management of forest resources in Uganda has vacillated from centralisation to decentralisation over the past century (Turyahabwe et al 2006). The first attempt to decentralise was in 1939-1947 with registration establishing local forest reserves under the districts' administration.…”
Section: Management Of Forestry Resources In Ugandamentioning
confidence: 99%