2007
DOI: 10.1515/multi.2007.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teasing in contact encounters: Frames, participant positions and responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These markers include smiles and laughter particles, mock aggression, use of nicknames, marked pronoun usage and formulaic expressions, as well as prosodic exaggeration (e.g. amplitude and register shifts, vowel lengthening and singsong intonation) (Glenn 2003;Haugh 2010;Jefferson 1979;Keltner et al 2001;Lytra 2007Lytra , 2010Miller 1986;Straehle 1993). Relatedly, lexical selection can also be exaggerated (as with 'extreme case formulations': all, always, the most, the best, every, never) (Edwards 2000;Pomerantz 1986).…”
Section: Supplementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These markers include smiles and laughter particles, mock aggression, use of nicknames, marked pronoun usage and formulaic expressions, as well as prosodic exaggeration (e.g. amplitude and register shifts, vowel lengthening and singsong intonation) (Glenn 2003;Haugh 2010;Jefferson 1979;Keltner et al 2001;Lytra 2007Lytra , 2010Miller 1986;Straehle 1993). Relatedly, lexical selection can also be exaggerated (as with 'extreme case formulations': all, always, the most, the best, every, never) (Edwards 2000;Pomerantz 1986).…”
Section: Supplementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These markers include smiles and laughter particles, mock aggression, use of nicknames, marked pronoun usage and formulaic expressions, as well as prosodic exaggeration (e.g. amplitude and register shifts, vowel lengthening and singsong intonation) (Glenn 2003;Haugh 2010;Jefferson 1979;Keltner et al 2001;Lytra 2007Lytra , 2010Miller 1986;Straehle 1993). Relatedly, lexical selection can also be exaggerated (as with 'extreme case formulations': all, always, the most, the best, every, never) (Edwards 2000;Pomerantz 1986).…”
Section: Supplementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overwhelmingly, the children of this study reported responding "seriously" to teasing. The children's narrations and drawings on how a recipient should respond were coded using Lytra's (2007) categories of responses to teasing: responding playfully (i.e., playful retaliations, playing along), keeping silent (i.e., nonresponses, ignore), and responding seriously (i.e., frame shifts, aggression, hurtful retaliations). Although at times children reported "just laugh along" or "tease him back" as appropriate responses (both indicative of playful retaliations), most often a serious response was favored (e.g., telling the teacher, calling the teaser a name, responding with aggression or an intense emotion such as crying or verbal direction such as, "Stop it").…”
Section: Responding Strategies To Teasingmentioning
confidence: 99%