2005
DOI: 10.1600/0363644053661850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teasing Apart Molecular- Versus Fossil-based Error Estimates when Dating Phylogenetic Trees: A Case Study in the Birch Family (Betulaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
62
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
9
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier dating studies (e.g. Forest et al 2005) produced even younger crown ages. Liu et al (2014) described A. clarnoensis on a combination of leaves, infructescences (woody catkins) and staminate inflorescences with in situ pollen, and considered it as a member of subgenus Alnus.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Earlier dating studies (e.g. Forest et al 2005) produced even younger crown ages. Liu et al (2014) described A. clarnoensis on a combination of leaves, infructescences (woody catkins) and staminate inflorescences with in situ pollen, and considered it as a member of subgenus Alnus.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When a fossil has been assigned to a clade, the stem node or the crown node of this clade can be used as constraint. Each assumption gives a different estimate of the divergence time (Forest et al, 2005). We chose to use stem nodes as constrained points (Wikström et al, 2001; Anderson et al, 2005; Renner, 2005), as it is the most inclusive group containing all extinct and extant members of a clade (Near et al, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, among the early diverging eudicots, Menispermaceae are unique in having an abundant and diverse fossil record. The family is an ideal group to evaluate the impact of fossil taxa on inferred relationships (Springer, 1995; Forest et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the initial records of the genus, which date to the Paleocene and Early Eocene, have been uncertainly assigned (Crane 1981). Molecular estimates predict that the genus Betula originated in the Late Eocene (Forest et al 2005). It is probable that Betula was rare in the early Tertiary but became abundant and taxonomically diverse in the late Tertiary (Němejc 1975, Środoń 1979, Huntley and Birks 1983.…”
Section: Fossil Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%