2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.88.062701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teardrop shapes minimize bending energy of fusion pores connecting planar bilayers

Abstract: A numerical gradient flow procedure was devised to characterize minimal energy shapes of fusion pores connecting two parallel planar bilayer membranes. Pore energy, composed of splay, tilt, and stretching, was obtained by modeling each bilayer as two monolayers and treating each monolayer of a bilayer membrane as a freely deformable surface described with a mean lipid orientation field. Voids between the two monolayers were prevented by a steric penalty formulation. Pore shapes were assumed to possess both axi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to characterize the tension required to expand such an early fusion pore, we calculated the line tension (see Materials and Methods), i.e., the force that the pore interface exerts against expansion, as a function of pore size (see Fig B and Materials and Methods). The early fusion pore features a gradual increase in line tension (λ) up to a radius (r) of 3 nm, which then converges to a constant value of ~24 pN, a number that is in agreement with estimations from elastic continuum models (Ryham et al , ). The estimated line tension of a fusion pore is thus about three times smaller than the line tension of a regular hole in a flat membrane, being ~74 pN within our model [~40 pN for POPC in atomistic simulations (West et al , )].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to characterize the tension required to expand such an early fusion pore, we calculated the line tension (see Materials and Methods), i.e., the force that the pore interface exerts against expansion, as a function of pore size (see Fig B and Materials and Methods). The early fusion pore features a gradual increase in line tension (λ) up to a radius (r) of 3 nm, which then converges to a constant value of ~24 pN, a number that is in agreement with estimations from elastic continuum models (Ryham et al , ). The estimated line tension of a fusion pore is thus about three times smaller than the line tension of a regular hole in a flat membrane, being ~74 pN within our model [~40 pN for POPC in atomistic simulations (West et al , )].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Fusion pore closure is opposed by an increase in bending stress (Ryham et al , ) and the unfavorable dehydration of lipid head groups (hydration repulsion) (Smirnova et al , ). The resulting, here‐predicted minimal pore size (~1.5 nm) should in principle allow free passage of small molecules, such as the fluorescent lumenal markers that we had used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistently, it has been shown that the fusion peptide promotes negative spontaneous curvature of the outer monolayer of the fusion pore (55). This hypothesis is supported by a continuum analysis, which calculated that fusion pores with negative spontaneous curvature in both monolayers lower their total energy by expansion (56). However, in the virus fusion scenario where the viral envelope is already highly curved, the subsequent release of membrane bending energy upon membrane fusion may contribute to pore expansion without an additional requirement for negative curvature exerted by palmitoyl.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The latter would, for example, occur in the presence of multiple (hemi)fusion events. Thus, the experimental observation of flickering fusion pores and subsequent opening/closing (1,2,9) may very well relate to rimpores as well as TFPs (9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The free energy barrier of rim-pore nucleation has been estimated in molecular simulation studies (5)(6)(7)(8). In contrast to the toroidal fusion pore (TFP) (9)(10)(11)(12), however, little is known about the free energy landscape of subsequent rim-pore expansion, i.e., dilation of excess HD material, before TFP formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%