Teamwork in prognostic communication: Addressing bottlenecks and barriers

Sisk, Bryan A.; Dobrozsi, Sarah; Mack, Jennifer W.

doi:10.1002/pbc.28192

Cited by 12 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 40 publications

(65 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…6 Two pictographs; a graph with survival only outcome versus a graph with multiple outcomes. 7 The three formats were embedded in fact box format, two studies were reported one face to face and one online. 8 Two conditions were tested in this study; only one contained prognostic information (middle ear infection) and was included.…”

Section: Graph Versus Tabular Format (Ie Fact Box) Format (4 Studies)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of different visual presentations on the comprehension of prognostic information: a systematic review

Abukmail

Bakhit

Mar

et al. 2021

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Understanding prognostic information can help patients know what may happen to their health over time and make informed decisions. However, communicating prognostic information well can be challenging. Purpose To conduct a systematic review to identify and synthesize research that has evaluated visual presentations that communicate quantitative prognostic information to patients or the public. Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (from inception to December 2020), and forward and backward citation search. Study selection Two authors independently screened search results and assessed eligibility. To be eligible, studies required a quantitative design and comparison of at least one visual presentation with another presentation of quantitative prognostic information. The primary outcome was comprehension of the presented information. Secondary outcomes were preferences for or satisfaction with the presentations viewed, and behavioral intentions. Data extraction Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Data synthesis Eleven studies (all randomized trials) were identified. We grouped studies according to the presentation type evaluated. Bar graph versus pictograph (3 studies): no difference in comprehension between the groups. Survival vs mortality curves (2 studies): no difference in one study; higher comprehension in survival curve group in another study. Tabular format versus pictograph (4 studies): 2 studies reported similar comprehension between groups; 2 found higher comprehension in pictograph groups. Tabular versus free text (3 studies): 2 studies found no difference between groups; 1 found higher comprehension in a tabular group. Limitations Heterogeneity in the visual presentations and outcome measures, precluding meta-analysis. Conclusions No visual presentation appears to be consistently superior to communicate quantitative prognostic information.

show abstract

Section: Graph Versus Tabular Format (Ie Fact Box) Format (4 Studies)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If prognostic information is not communicated adequately, patients may have inaccurate expectations about the likely course of their illness [3][4][5]. Poor communication of prognostic information can also make patients anxious, confused, and damage the relationship between clinician and patient [6,7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of different visual presentations on the comprehension of prognostic information: a systematic review

Abukmail

Bakhit

Mar

et al. 2021

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Supporting teamwork in the delivery of cancer care has been a major focus of national cancer organizations for the last decade 1,138 . One goal of supporting teamwork has been to decrease “tremendous waste and inefficiencies due to poor coordination of care.” 1 Communication is an essential part of this teamwork and requires additional study 139 . For example, how do teams develop a shared mental model about what has been communicated and what ought to be communicated with families?…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multilevel barriers and facilitators of communication in pediatric oncology: A systematic review

Sisk

Harvey

Friedrich

et al. 2021

Pediatric Blood & Cancer

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multiple factors can facilitate or impede the fulfillment of communication functions in pediatric cancer. In this systematic review, we evaluated 109 studies from the preceding 20 years that presented qualitative or quantitative evidence of barriers or facilitators to communication in pediatric cancer. Using a multilevel framework developed in our prior study, we then analyzed and categorized the levels of barriers and facilitators identified in included studies. The vast majority of studies focused on individual‐level barriers, rather than team, organization/system, collaborating hospital, community, or policy‐level barriers. Future studies should explore the full range of factors that affect communication.

show abstract

“…There is evidence that many candidates miss job opportunities due to gaps in the following areas: a sense of initiative [7][8][9], ability to work in a team [10][11][12], self-efficacy [13][14][15][16], resilience [17 -19], problem-solving [20][21][22] and the ability to create valuable products and services. In addition, they have great difficulty in generating their jobs [23][24][25][26][27] and developing as freelancers [7,28,29].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entrepreneurial Skills to Be Successful In the Global and Digital World: Proposal for a Frame of Reference for Entrepreneurial Education

Jardim¹

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For most professionals to be successful in the current job market, they need some entrepreneurial skills (ES). This study aimed to describe and systematize these skills, considering the current globalization and digital transformation phenomena. The documental analysis and the critical reflection on the collected data allowed us to identify the socio-economic and socio-cultural reasons for the relevance of this problem. Consequently, to elaborate a frame of reference that is intended to be adequate to the needs of the professionals of the current global and digital era. The results pointed to a tripartite ES model - to be open to novelty, to create solutions to emerging problems, and to communicate effectively - which integrates the following skills: creativity and innovation, the spirit of initiative, self-efficacy and resilience, strategic planning, and evaluation, resolution of problems and decision-making, transformational leadership, clear and visual communication, teamwork and networking, and digital communication. In the continuation of this study, an ES scale will be created and validated according to this model, which will make it possible to measure the degree of development of these competencies.

show abstract

Teamwork in prognostic communication: Addressing bottlenecks and barriers

Cited by 12 publications

References 40 publications

Effect of different visual presentations on the comprehension of prognostic information: a systematic review

Effect of different visual presentations on the comprehension of prognostic information: a systematic review

Multilevel barriers and facilitators of communication in pediatric oncology: A systematic review

Entrepreneurial Skills to Be Successful In the Global and Digital World: Proposal for a Frame of Reference for Entrepreneurial Education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About